Livingston

Oct
08
2008

Liveblogging in the U.S.A.

liveblog1 Liveblogging is not a new phenomenon, but with the Presidential debates over the past few weeks, it’s come into the limelight. There are a few benefits to liveblogging, and a couple different methods of doing it.

(Photo Credit: MEGATONik)

Benefits of Liveblogging

Liveblogging is beneficial for a variety of reasons.

  • It provides quick and easy content for your blog, Twitter stream, etc.
  • It gives people who are not at the event an opportunity to view the content and respond, in real time or after the fact.
  • It provides an interactive platform and generates conversation for attendees of the event (and those following remotely) to discuss what was said, or a place to reflect after the fact.
  • It gives a point of reference to go back to and make commentary on key points after the event is over.

Ways to Liveblog

There are a few methods to approaching liveblogging. Some methods can be combined to give a more comprehensive view.

  • Provide short “play-by-plays” with time-stamped updates. Consider using an embedded system designed specifically for this, such as CoveritLive.
  • Provide a general overview of the event. Summarize what was said and provide your own commentary and insight. Paraphrase what the speaker is saying.
  • Provide content from the event with as much verbatim as possible. For example, if you are attending a conference panel session, include all Powerpoint slide content (if applicable), and try to write as much detail and exact phrases as possible from the speaker.
  • Provide alternative methods of getting information, other than through your blog. Mix it up by using Twitter, uStream, Utterli (formerly Utterz), or like services. Many people also bring their flipcams to events and simply upload the entire video to their blog and social networks.

liveblog When choosing a method, think about factors such as your organization’s (or personal) goals for liveblogging, your blog audience, attendees of the event, and content of the speaker. Think about whether or not you are liveblogging to increase traffic to your site, or to provide valuable information to the public. Consider your audience and how they absorb information. Liveblogging using short updates (think Twitter) may make more sense for a Web 2.0 audience, while more general overviews of content with commentary may work well for an IT crowd.

(Picture Credit: Flickr)

It’s also important to consider the content you are sharing. Make sure it’s valuable to your audience.

A good example of how to do a “play-by-play” comes from Mashable:

This doesn’t mean “Speaker X walks up to the podium, clears throat and opens with quip about your mom,” but more like, “Speaker X says trust is the most important factor in determining marketing success. Jack from Company Y challenges this.”

Keep in mind that your content is openly available to the public, and can be reused in a variety of ways that you may not be aware of. Take Doug Haslam’s experience for example.

Boy was I surprised to hear my snarky Tweets about this week’s Vice-Presidential debate ended up on Current TV’s broadcast of the debate.

What other reasons can you think of to liveblog? Are there other ways to approach liveblogging?

4 Responses to “Liveblogging in the U.S.A.”

  • Craig Says:

    For someone who wanted to set up a liveblog for the debates, tv show, game, whatever they desire. Would it be possible for them to establish a type of chat room forum so users can get involved too besides just adding comments? Or does that defeat the entire purpose of the blog?

    Craig
    http://www.budgetpulse.com

  • Richie Escovedo Says:

    Larissa - Very good post on live blogging with some good suggestions. I wish I had been able to read it before I tried to live blog earlier today. I will say this though, to me live blogging is not as easy as it looks (http://tinyurl.com/3oqf4t).

  • Mary Fletcher Jones Says:

    Live blog or fully live in the moment (and blog about it later)? I choose option B. I can see the value of live blogging for things that are really time-critical. And even then, with care…

    From a different point of view, I’m not a big fan of live blogging for other uses, and I just wrote a post that indirectly addresses the whole balance between the quick and easy connection appeal of social media and the importance of bona fide and mindful connections with real live people :)

    I tried it for the debates, and it was fun for a lark, but it reminded me too much of old AOL chatrooms with a lot of poseur quipping…so not my thing. I like to be entertained but it just gets annoying. I started to long for comments with real substance and thought.

    I REALLY don’t like it at conferences. People liveblog during the podcast conferences I go to, but to me, it just seems slightly rude. Like they’re not really paying full attention to the speaker, or they’re slightly checked out. Or when it’s used for Q&A, like they did at Interact and not everyone had access to it and the roll of tweets (some self-promoting ones, too) was distracting from the presentation on stage.

  • Trackbacks

  • Your page is now on StumbleUpon! Says:

    Kramer auto Pingback[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]

Leave a Reply

Twitter Users!
Enter your personal information in the form or sign in with your Twitter account by clicking the button below.