Livingston

Nov
30
2007

SMC-DC Recap

Thursday night at Viget Labs in Falls Church, Social Media Club DC met for a presentation by Jim Long (@newmediajim) of Verge New Media on Twitter. Jim is a well-known cameraman and journalist for NBC Universal, and is a great example of someone who uses Twitter the way it was designed to be used.

The presentation of “best practices” took some different twists and turns due to a very interactive audience (which was great), but the one section that I enjoyed was the idea of Twitter providing “ambient intimacy” between users. As said by Lisa Reichelt:

It makes us feel closer to people we care for but in whose lives we’re not able to participate as closely as we’d like.

Jim had numerous examples of sentimental Twitter moments where he was happy to share in both exciting and sad news with his network. The feeling that people out there in “Twitter-land” cared about him and his well-being, and were able to share and relate to his successes and sadness (for example during the Virginia Tech shootings earlier this year), provide a medium for communication that is accessible, user-friendly, and best of all (according to Jim), mobile.

We also talked about the idea that Participation is Marketing, and that his experience with Twitter is that it’s his way of sharing things that excite him, encourage participation, ask for help, and overall give a talkback channel and “human face” back to NBC - also getting people to turn their TVs back on and watch the news.

Jim’s view on Twitter best practices include:

  • Get out and DO IT!
  • Listen
  • Engage
  • Celebrate others
  • Be relevant/add to conversation
  • Promote yourself!

A good time was had by all, and it was great to see some old and new faces at the event. Special thanks to Viget Labs for hosting us and to Rana Sobhany for streaming Jim live on ustream.

In addition to those of us who were able to actually attend the event, the Twitter world was following along, including Connie Reece (@conniereece) and Cathryn Hrudicka (@CreativeSage). It was pretty cool that people were able to participate in any way possible.

For those of you who were unable to attend, here are some links highlighting the event.

Shashi Bellamkonda from My Digital Thoughts highlights some of the attendees and topics of conversation.

Brian Williams of Viget posts his thoughts on Twitter and how it created a conversation about an issue with Mixx.

Nick O’Neill of the Social Times was a step ahead of us.

Paul Hyland posts his thoughts.

Live stream of the presentation can be found here:

Nov
30
2007

Silicon Valley Smack Down Coming for Google, Cisco?

Full disclosure: I performed consulting work for Verizon Wireless’s federal division this year.

Wednesday’s wireless announcement from Verizon Wireless spawned a huge discussion amongst social media-ites on how this stacks up with Google’s Android initiative. Today, Google’s decision to bid on a wireless WiMax license became public, so this discussion will really take off.  Cisco has already indicated sincere interest in a 700 MHZ, and there are rumblings that Apple wants one, too.

My takeaway is that Verizon Wireless is not going to willingly yield any space to new players. And please, folks, don’t think just Verizon when you think of this company. Also think of Vodafone, the world’s largest mobile phone company. They own 45 percent of Verizon Wireless.

And not to be forgotten is AT&T, which has a leg up with the iPhone right now. Sprint is deploying the world’s first WiMAX network in an effort to regain market share.

So why are Google and Cisco such hot wireless talk? Because it’s the web 2.0 crowd driving a lot of the hype.

Rarely do I blog about tech tools these days.  Why? Because its about communications between people, not the mechanisms.  Also, I’m a marketer, not a tech analyst, so I prefer not to dwell on areas that I can’t offer value.  Wireless is different.

Can Google and Cisco Really Compete?

As a former wireless reporter (I even co-authored a book on 3G), I doubt either of these newbies really understands wireless, and I have serious doubts about Android’s ability to pull it all together.  Google has made serious inroads into the virtual desktop, but not the OS marketplace… Yet. It looks like Android might be that OS… Might be.

Data throughput has always been the holy grail of wireless networks since the 80s. Both Motorola and IBM tried to create wireless data networks in the 90s and they got their butts kicked by the conventional telephony cos. Then there were the rise and fall of paging networks. And yeah, the rise and still not fully realized dream of 3G networks.

Even today, wireless data sonly comprises 15.5 percent of U.S. wireless revenue. That’s increasing significantly at 63.3 percent rate, says CTIA.  But it’s important to remember that wireless data has always been the Holy Grail of the Wireless carriers.

It’s hard to see how Cisco or Google will understand the dynamics of RF modeling, streaming wireless IP at high rates to hundreds of diverse devices, RPU or any of the many other factors that go into creating a successful wireless business. The over-exuberance from the web 2.0 crowd on this one makes no sense given past history.

There’s a great probability that some silicon valley humble pie is about to be dished out to Google and Cisco. Neither of these companies has a core competency in managing national or even regional wireless networks. The 700 MHz ventures are outside of their brand terrain. Of the two, if either will succeed it’s Cisco because they’re smart enough to team with an established wireless player.

The truth of the matter is no one knows what’s going to happen.  Let the market figure it out before everyone crowns Google the new wireless hero.

Nov
30
2007

My Black is Beautiful

Procter & Gamble unveils a new campaign that many are calling a ‘movement’ directed at the African American woman. The campaign, My Black is Beautiful, is expected to roll out in 2008 with a conversation tour.

The campaign is a great initiative that seems to include everything. Not only will the tour visit select cities, it will offer beauty and lifestyle tips. Elements of it will be included in the Pantene Total You Tour, which travels to four metro markets. A social networking component to keep females connected will also be added to myblackisbeautiful.com.

But the message of the campaign is the real success — teaching women young and old that they are beautiful, inside and out. A recent article says a poll P&G conducted with Essence during the summer revealed that 71 percent of black women feel they are portrayed worse in the media than any other racial group. Sixty nine percent said that young woman are negatively influenced by those images.

P&G launched the effort earlier this year. Brands connected to My Black is Beautiful are Pantene Pro V Shine, Covergirl Queen Collection, Crest and Always.

I’m not African American, but I was easily influenced by the images of women I saw portrayed as a child– Charlie’s’ Angeles, The Bionic Women. I could have benefited from engaging in a social network about those images.

Encouraging and helping women to define their own beauty standard, whatever that may be, and whatever race you are, is ideal at any age.

Kudos to Procter & Gamble.

Nov
29
2007

Community Manager Q&A with Connie Bensen

ConnieBensenThe Buzz Bin spoke to Connie Benson, community manager for the ACDSee blog. ACD Systems has been recognized the world over as the leader in image management and technical illustration software.

Connie’s role as community manager give her an opportunity to interact with the community she is a part of, as well as implement and monitor the social media channels available to the community. Her tips and insight into social media marketing are useful for any new (or old) corporate marketing professional. And she’s a pretty good Twitterer, too!

BB: ACDSee’s blog is already generating comments. Do you find the ACDSee related posts or general industry posts are drawing folks in?

CB: Product related posts are receiving the most attention. My sense is that people want to learn more about using the products.

BB: What other social media channels is ACDSee using?

CB: ACDSee product forums (including betas), forums in community at large, Facebook,

Social media tools: Google alerts, Trailfire, wiki’s, MS LiveWriter, video, webinars, Snag-it, Evernote, Thunderbird, Mozilla (Flock now)

Analytics: Feedburner, Mybloglog, Google Analytics, Technorati

BB: How hard is it to generate momentum for this effort?

CB: Internally my efforts are fully supported & it’s a concerted effort across many departments. The ACDSee team is open to my ideas & are joining me in blogging.

In the ACDSee community I provide the energy & the momentum happens. It has been quite easy to find product champions. They add their own enthusiasm & our efforts grow. Combine that with the fact that ACDSee creates great products and the conversation spreads beyond the confines of the ACDSee product forums. The traditional marketing campaigns reinforce my efforts & provide reiteration that we value our customers.

BB: What tips would you offer the newbie corporate marketer experimenting with social media?

CB:

1. Listen to your community, Understand, then Get Involved

  • Get to know your community
  • Let them know that you care & provide them with service
  • Gather feedback to improve products & customer support
  • Be transparent, honest, & trust will develop
  • Provide Value – don’t spam people with inappropriate information
  • Respect that you’re in social spaces

2. Have a strategy before engaging

  • Experiment first & learn the tools
  • Don’t be afraid to fail

3. Network for professional development – everyone is willing to share ideas

4. Never stop learning. This space is changing so fast.

BB: What is your personal philosophy on social media?

CB: Utilizing social media & WOM is a very effective, cost efficient way to promote a product or service. Customers love the interaction & personal feel that it offers. They appreciate user generated content & are thrilled to create & share it! Self service is important to them when they’re looking for tutorials & resources. My philosophy is that if that type of energy exists then we should provide them with the tools and let them go. Helping shape the message results in a powerful alliance. And the serendipity that sometimes results is amazing for both the customer & the company!

BB: How much of your personal philosophy around social media marketing is affected by your day-to-day experiences at ACDSee versus influence through participation in the social media world?

CB: My personal philosophy is rooted in my own experiences as a customer & my previous experience in marketing/public relations for a non-profit organization. In joining ACDSee I’m listening to their needs & working to establish how we can optimize our customer’s experience. It’s wonderful that ACDSee is just as enthusiastic as I am about the value & potential for integrating social media into our marketing efforts. My participation in the social media world will definitely continue to influence & shape my philosophy.

BB: What’s next for Connie Bensen and ACDSee?

CB: My goals are to:

  • Continue to build brand awareness
  • Assist with development of exciting new products based on customer feedback
  • Meet more people - Continue networking with social media practitioners
  • Help others with social media - Provide mentorship & resources to individuals & companies
  • Play with my Nikon D80 more! - Learn more about the software industry & digital imaging field
Nov
28
2007

The Buzz Bin’s 500th Post: Beware of Big Britches

We’ve come a long way since the first Diary of an Ad Man post. But rather than wax poetic, let’s get on with the business at hand.

Some bloggers who have achieved notoriety start believing their own hype and flaunt unwarranted egotism. The result of these new big britches is an angered readership. They were attracted by great content that served their needs. When their loyalty is rewarded with bursts of arrogant or self-oriented content, readers vote with their feet. Blogs start losing readership. This does not mean a death sentence for a blog, so long as the writer(s) realizes what’s happening and engages in a course correction.

Examples

Last summer Robert Scoble went on a Facebook frenzy that also included a new high in popularity. Soon readers were treated with comments about how he couldn’t have more than 5000 friends, nor could he believe that several friends had dropped him. Then there were incredibly excited statements about Facebook, and when backlash occurred irritable comments in his posts. Then there were mia culpas. What happened? People noticed (see chronicle of events on Technosailor) and there was less traffic.

scoble.jpg


Since then Scobleizer’s back in form and seems to have leveled off.

How about Steve Rubel? Boy, has Micro Persuasion fallen off. First he seemed to lose relevance and timeliness. Then when he blogged he created these grand proclamations. These were sweeping statements that seemed to have been started by other marketing bloggers. When called on it, Rubel said:

“I see this isn’t a new idea. I had missed others’ prior posts on this subject. I don’t read other PR blogs beyond the ones that my colleagues pen. There’s only so much time in the day and had to cut down my feed list.”

Ouch! Then there was the whole, “I don’t need to blog that often, I can just Twitter” bit. The end result, less traffic, and loss of the position in the Ad Age 150 as the #2 marketing blogger. Who took his place? Copyblogger (tied with Seth for first). Interesting to note that traffic stats had Steve and Brian neck and neck one year ago.

rubelclark.jpg



Steve is blogging regularly again, and some minds think a resurgence may be in the works.

Who’s next? Maybe Michael Arrington after publishing a guest column that recommended astroturfing. Or his no-show at BlogWorld. Keep it up, Mr. Arrington. I can only tell you that sooner or later folks will vote with their feet. We’ve seen A list bloggers who collapsed in this segment because of similar issues.

Then there are those who are quick to call out newer bloggers who don’t have the years of history that some do. Be careful, fellas. Social media communities are fickle ones, and demanding respect on yesteryear’s work is a fast way to lose mindshare. Don’t rest on your laurels. There’s a ton of new, hungry savvy players who get social media. And they want your community’s eyeballs.

Moving Forward

The Buzz Bin has enjoyed a lot of popularity as of late. But make no bones about it, we understand it’s because our writing in the past eight-nine months has been designed to serve you, not because we’re hot stuff. The moment we forget who we’re writing for and start believing all of the hype is the day when the downward spiral begins. We will continue our Hustle 2.0 approach!

I’ll leave this post with one final note. Seventeen months ago this company was only two months old when it was almost wiped out by a tragic flood (see blog post four hours afterwards). The catastrophe affected 150 homes in my neighborhood.

This blog was used to fight for the Huntington neighborhood, and serve its immediate physical community. No matter how high we climb or how far we fall, for me that time will always offer some of the most cherished moments in this blog’s history. At that time, the average day saw 15-25 readers.

Enough. On to 501.

Nov
28
2007

The Ongoing Battle: MySpace and Facebook

When I logged onto MySpace yesterday, I noticed a somewhat annoying pop-up at my Home dashboard.

Friend updates are here.

I am now able to view updates of up to 40 of my nearest and dearest, which include notifications when they update their profile, add new photos, music, video, or blogs.

A good idea in theory, but why has MySpace decided to limit the number of friend status updates available? It’s similar to the way that MySpace regulates how many “Top Friends” you can designate, although certain programs can work around that.

MySpace

This profile update feature comes in addition to the “friend status updates” feature which appeared (quite quietly in my mind) a few months ago, similar to the status updates on Facebook.

It seems that MySpace has been struggling to catch up to the features that Facebook has. While at the same time, Facebook has opened itself up to more customization, and also some negative decisions.

The question of timing is an interesting one. While Facebook users are up 125%, MySpace is only up a paltry 19%. So, is MySpace trying to emulate Facebook in hopes of gaining more users? It’s especially good timing in the sense that Facebook has been under such fire about Beacon, showing that it can be the “bad” social networking site and invade user privacy on a whole other level. Not only is it annoying to have the newsfeed and friend updates (which caused its own controversy when it happened), but now there is the problem of advertising (ABC political ads for one), privacy while shopping online (Beacon) and I’m sure more to come.

Before, MySpace was considered the “unprofessional” social networking site, due to its customizable pages and often flashy and distracting look and feel. The ability to add music and video to your page made it different, but now Facebook allows that as well. MySpace in conjunction with MTV hosted a series of dialogues with political candidates, and now Facebook has turned to ABC for their partner.

Facebook was different because you could tag photos of yourself and others, but now MySpace allows that too. So why is MySpace continually upgrading to applications and functions that seem to mirror Facebook’s offerings, and why does it seem that Facebook continues to add applications that provide similar services to MySpace?

Maybe these questions and conflicts are just the growing pains that social networking sites have to feel in order to evolve. However, if both MySpace and Facebook continue to offer similar features and services, then the space for competition will be weakened to a question of personal preference.

If there is room for McDonald’s and Burger King, Target and Wal-Mart, then there is space for these sites to continue to go head to head in functionality and user benefits. A clear leader will perhaps be just a matter of opinion.

Nov
27
2007

Facebook’s Lost Way

welcome_3Facebook has lost its way. The open network that everyone loved to play in has become the latest social media experiment for Madison Ave. And the end result? Angry community members who have found their privacy violated over and over again by Facebook’s new Beacon application.

In addition to the much talked about Beacon nightmare, Facebook is now telling community members which news sources to read (thanks to Jeremy Pepper for sharing this link). I wonder how much ABC paid for this right?

You wake up, check in, and see an ABC ad like this in your feed:

facebookads.jpg

Note the difference between Jesse Thomas’s consumer generated referral for a laptop and the unsolicited spam Facebook and ABC has created. I may click through to see what kind of computer Jesse and Scott are talking about, but I’ll be damned if I’m clicking on the ABC ad.

The message Facebook has sent to us all: “We value revenue over community.”

This is a horrific error.

Community First

Facebook was exciting from a social media standpoint because it allowed us to interact and play with each other. From family and friends to colleagues and consumer groups. But it was driven by we, the people, not they, the advertisers. And as Todd Defren duly noted yesterday, Facebook may lose a lot of traction on this one.

Late last week I did an unrelated interview for the Bulgarian blog Rich&Forts. In it we discussed creating sales-oriented social media campaigns:

If the outcome is sales, then the program must be engineered to generate sales… Now if a program is engineered to build excitement with an obvious call to action, and nothing happens than there are several issues that could be in play. The most obvious is the company or organization placed too much emphasis on the sale and too little on creating value for the community through the social media or [word of mouth (WOM)] effort. In the end, creating value drives consumer interest in WOM campaigns and this can never be supplanted by the actual desired outcome.

When you sacrifice community for dollars, you lose both. No community equals no transactions.

Marketers and companies must understand it’s a fractured media environment and that consumers have Millions of Choices. How long until consumers think that another media form is more interesting than Facebook?

Organizations who use social media for WOM campaigns, or hope to generate revenue through this dynamic two-way medium must serve their communities! Participation is marketing! Attraction has supplanted promotion: Never forget it, or you will lose your way.

I made a joke in an interview that Google was kind of like the CIA, less intelligent than everyone thinks. All jokes aside, you have to think Google outsmarted Microsoft again when it opted to promote OpenSocial in favor of investing in Facebook.

Nov
27
2007

Solis and Livingston on BlogTalkRadio Today

Brian Solis and I will appear today on Mike McGrath’s BlogTalkRadio show at 2 Eastern, 11 Pacific.  We’ll be discussing some parts of the book, namely whether or not social media is right for a corporate culture, as well as the seven principles of community building

Interested parties who want to talk with Brian and I should call in after the show starts at (646) 478-5503. The show will remain on the BlogTalkRadio site as a podcast.

Nov
27
2007

Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire!

blogoffirelargerFacebook has come under a lot of fire the past few months, and it doesn’t appear to be getting any better with the new Beacon controversy. Steve O’Hear at ZDNet offers some insight into social networking literacy as well as some commentary on Facebook’s latest negative venture. As social media continues to evolve, and users take advantage of all (or none) of the features available through social networks, we can all be sure that “the Facebook we signed up to and invested time in today, may be very different to the one that exists tomorrow.”

What’s Next blog shows that social media stats are supported by word of mouth marketing. Facebook alone has grown 125%.

Hulu, the new online video service from NBC Universal and NewsCorp. is tested out by Beneath the Brand. A thumbs up was given for professional video content, with a nice user interface and easy to find content.

Proctor & Gamble recently came forward with an innovative green campaign, which greenormal breaks down. P&G strategies include reducing environmental waste in production (10% per unit in
CO2 emissions, energy consumption, water consumption and
disposed waste from P&G plants, leading to a total reduction
over the decade of at least 40%), participation in social responsibility programs, and setting a “financial target for developing and selling new “greener” items, rather than for waste or energy reduction.”

John Wall of Ronin Marketeer predicts the social media outlook for the new year (courtesy of RonAmok). He asks questions about email usage, corporate blogging, online video, snack media, feeds, mashups, and SEO. A good overview of the industry.

Nov
26
2007

Leading with Lewis Green

lewis-nyc-shotLewis Green is the founder and managing principal of L&G Business Solutions.  He is also the author of the blog, bizsolutionsplus Featuring Solutions to Grow Your Business. Lewis has three decades of business management experience and is the author of five books. Lewis took some time to talk to the Buzz Bin about his most recent book, Lead With Your Heart.

BB: You make an impassioned plea to executives and entrepreneurs to change the way do business. How many businesses are conscious of their motives?

LG: Geoff, I think most business leaders and managers believe that their first responsibility is to make a profit. And that is the first and foremost motive for everything they say and do within their company. I wrote Lead With Your Heart because while I understand the importance of profits, without which there can be no business or business growth, I also believe that measuring success based on profit, or winning as it is called by Jack Welch in his book, limits a company’s ability to maximize their potential and creates an environment where greed and corruption can thrive. In Lead With Your Heart, I urge a business model where our ultimate motive is driven to create a world in which happiness supersedes profit and a company’s primary motive. By doing so, we create a company culture in which people come first, starting with employees. Such a culture creates a passion for our work because ultimately it is about making people’s lives better, inspiring and motivating employees to become the best they can be, resulting in customers who are touched positively by those employees, often turning those customers into brand evangelists.

BB: Lead with Your Heart focuses a great deal on strategy and leadhiwebbusiness plans before marketing. Why?

LG: People do better when we have a clear sense of mission (why we are doing something) combined with a road map (how we will achieve that mission) and a destination point (how we know when we are achieving the mission). I believe with all my heart that marketing cannot exist in a vacuum or in an environment wherein the only charge marketers have is to get products and services noticed and ultimately sold. Like all functional areas within a business, if marketing understands why the business exists and where it wants to go (the business plan), we can then create annual strategic plans that lay out the tactics for supporting the company’s existence (values = brand), and the goals to achieve annual growth. With the Strategic Plan built each year atop the Business Plan, we provide a culture of growth wherein all employees are striving for and contributing to the same goals. In that scenario, which some call alignment, we create a business where everyone begins at the same start line and all finish together (or not at all) at the same finish line. As for marketing, the pressure it taken off a single department for brand development and sales leads because the entire culture is charged to achieve the same measurable goals, at least one of which will be a sales figure. With everyone pushing in the same direction, marketing can spend more time focusing on customer happiness than what we often find marketing spending most of their time on today—packaging, loud advertising, PR spin and exaggerated marketing claims, which hurt more than help the brand and sales.

BB: You mention that companies that place principles before profits perform better on Wall Street. Can you share some of your research?

LG: Those of us who have read Built to Last or Good to Great can’t help but notice one of the commonalities of businesses such as HP, 3M, Harley-Davidson or NASCAR in that each has created incredible value. How did they do it? They build incredibly tight bonds with their employees and their customers. In each case, the business is built upon a foundation of strong values where people come first. They work diligently to create great people experiences, creating happy customers who become loyal. Each company’s logo represents trust and credibility. In the ‘80s and early ‘90s Wall Street was slow to recognize that passion for values could create the same or better profits for a company than say a company such as GE during the Jack Welch years. Here’s what I mean: Welch built an incredibly successful plan for business growth that was tied to valuation (top line revenues) and shareholder value. But it wasn’t the kind of company that put people first. Through sheer force and conviction, Welch’s GE succeeded on Wall Street. Meanwhile, Howard Schultz led Starbucks to even faster growth on a percentage basis. But he did so believing all along that people, not profits, came first. I was in on some of the analyst’s calls and heard Wall Street’s cynicism and disbelief when Howard talked about values and people instead of ways to cut costs. Did Starbucks stock do better than GE’s? It depends on how one views better. Both stocks did exceedingly well, but the primary difference is that Starbucks has such loyal employees and customers that productivity is high, turnover is low, and margins are good. Starbucks never makes a sale due to price. And Starbucks spends very little on marketing and advertising. I don’t think GE can say the same

BB: Tell us about your experiences with Starbucks.

LG: I joined Starbucks in 1996 as its first internal communications employee. At the time, the Communications Department was but a few months old. My work area was about 15 feet from Howard Schultz’s office. The Starbucks business model and the executives who created it and led it impressed me so much that it changed the way I thought about business. To begin with, this was the first company experience I had where employees came first, ahead of customers, because without great, passionate and happy employees we cannot have great, passionate and happy customers. I took a demotion to work for Starbucks, and it was the best thing I ever did in my career. Serving as an executive speechwriter as well as eventually leading the group that built brand through internal communications, I learned more about how to treat people and how to run a business than ever before.

BB: What other socially responsible companies do you admire?

LG: In addition to the ones mention above, I am a huge fan of Wild Oats, but one wonders how they may change under Whole Foods ownership. I also respect Southwest Airlines, Timberland, IBM and Microsoft for their willingness to reach out to their communities. Most of all, I admire all those small businesses that touch so many in so many good ways but never get the headlines.

BB: You are using Facebook to market Lead with Your Heart quite a bit. How do you think it’s going?

LG: I think it’s too soon to tell but in the first day after creating the group we had 83 members. I like using social media because it allows me to build relationships with people who think alike. My goal for the group is to create a grassroots movement through which we can make a difference in people’s lives.

BB: What’s next for Lewis Green?

LG: I continue to run my own marketing and communications firm, L&G Business Solutions. My immediate goal is to spread the word about what we can do to make business and the world a better place to live through the book, social media, presentations and workshops. The seed for my next book has already been planted, which will take the Lead With Your Heart business model and apply it to education.