Social Good Live Stream/Preso & Social Marketing University

It’s a great honor to be in New York City today and speaking at Mashable’s Social Good Conference. This event wraps up Mashable’s Summer of Social Good, and features fantastic speakers with many nonprofit attendees. It will be a great opportunity for folks You can catch the live stream of the conference here. Also, below find my 15 minute presentation on Social Media for Social Good.

Also, Nedra Weinrich is starting up her Social Marketing University series of classes again this Fall. Any beginners or intermediates seeking to get a better grasp of this business should attend. I checked it out last year and was impressed by Nedra’s comprehensive approach to online and social marketing communications. She teaches online and in person. In person classes slated include:

Social Marketing University (Advanced Course):
Berkeley, CA
September 14-15, 2009

Social Marketing University (Foundations Course):
Washington, DC
January 11-13, 2010

Social Marketing University (Advanced Course):
Los Angeles, CA
Spring 2010

 

The Science Behind Social Change Might Be Better

Guest Post by Alexandra “SocialButterfly” Rampy

2328879637_c0d2e376ff

That term–social marketing–is buzzing across the blogosphere, our inboxes and in conference rooms. However, did you know that it’s been around since the 1970s? …and fundamentally, it has nothing to do with Twitter, flickr, Ning, Myspace or Facebook. It’s much bigger than that.

This is because social marketing has everything to do with behavior–influencing it and changing it. Simply put, I like to say that social marketing is the science behind social change. It is not social media. Read that line again. People often confuse the term “social marketing” to mean two very different concepts: 1) social media marketing and 2) the real, science behind social change. While the two have much to learn from each other, they are not one in the same. (For a deeper clarification, check out Nedra Weinreich’s dichotemy.)

I realize my 140-character friendly definition of social marketing is a bit of a simplification, which is easy to say and harder to implement. In the past month, we’ve been writing and reading about movements, and many of us touch–either directly or indirectly–work that deals with social change. We love it, live it and on an increasing rate–crave it. Climate change. Poverty. HIV/AIDS. Human Rights. Animal Rights. But moving the needle is tough work. It’s persistent work. It’s not glamorous, and you, or your organization, can’t do it alone.

We can live social change, and we can do social change. But, until we study it and own it as a discipline, we won’t be as successful in our movements as we could be. As a follower of the Buzz Bin, I know a large focus of dialogue here is on social change, so I want to share some social marketing tools to add to the tool belt (that don’t require a log-in):

  • Social Marketing Listserv. Join over 3000+ great social marketeers from 38 countries who, on a daily basis, discuss the latest trends, research and updates regarding behavior change and social change.
  • Academic Textbooks. There are over 12 social marketing textbooks. My current favorite–Social Marketing in the 21st Century by Georgetown’s Alan Andreason. Ever heard of Philip Kotler? Marketing guru. Ya, he helped invent social marketing, along with Nancy Lee. Bill Novelli? Yup, him too. The best part–so can you, and it can start with the turn of a page.
  • Ongoing Research. Check out the the Social Marketing Quarterly.
  • Successful Case Studies. Here. Here. Here. and Here.
  • Social Marketing and Behavior Change Experts: Start following @chiefmaven, @stephendann, @sm1guru, @Nedra, @mikekujawski and others.
  • Captivating Conferences. In late 2008, the 1st World Social Marketing Conference was held in Brighton. There is also the Social Marketing in Public Health conference held every year in Florida. The 2010 conference will mark its 20th anniversary!
  • Social Marketing Association. This is in the midst of being formed and will launch at the 20th Anniversary at the above mentioned conference. Philip Kotler has already confirmed to do the kick-off. Feel free to join 300+ fellow change makers in this effort.

When it comes time to implement, perhaps we need to start by thinking–Are we asking the right questions? Or, as Jay Baer put it, or we addressing the WHY before HOW? To add some visual and emotional elements to the discussion, I like how this video turns the tables and asks different questions of us:

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIZ56OrLQ5k

So, fellow changemakers-movement-igniters, next time we buzz through the blogosphere, open our email, or sit around in the conference room, perhaps we start not with what tool or tactic should be used. But instead, ask first:

  • What behavior are we wanting to change?
  • What problem can we help solve?
  • Where do we want to go?
  • What’s our long-term plan?
  • How can we involve the consumer in developing the product, service, message, initiative, movement?
  • What are the barriers to the behavior we want to influence? the benefits?
  • What is our consumers’ current environment? Can we change it and how?
  • How can we add joy into the mix? Will rewarding good behavior provide more results than making consequences for bad behavior?
  • Before we write a press release to promote something, think first about the other four marketing p’s: price, product and place. Is there a certain product or service we can add into the mix to address behavior change? Is there a certain place in the consumer’s decision-making process where we need to active?
  • What does success look like?
  • Sound off: What other questions should we, with our social marketing hats on, be asking?
  • Alexandra Rampy is a social marketing believer, blogger, practitioner, researcher and enthusiast. Connect with her on Twitter and on her blog.

     

    LIVESTRONG Brand Transcends Cancer

    4637_82800949915_6195089915_1690408_2840487_n

    When you start seeing photos like this one, you know a brand has superseded it’s organization to become something beyond just, “fight cancer.” There’s no question that the Lance Armstrong Foundation’s singleness of purpose is just that, and the organization does a fantastic job building awareness and raising money for cancer prevention and research. Below find an interview with LIVESTRONG’s Online Community Evangelist Brooke McMillan. But first, a little marketing analysis.

    4637_82907419915_6195089915_1691813_1878334_n No other brand in the cancer segment of the nonprofit space has this kind of movement behind it.  And there are some great organizations like Alex’s Lemonade Stand (full disclosure, my sister Joanne Marder is the office manager at Alex’s) and the venerable American Cancer Society.

    The difference lies in the brand’s promise to people, which transcends cancer and brings hope to cancer patients, survivors, their families and society in general. LIVESTRONG brings hope to all. For many, the LIVESTRONG brand means:

    Together, we can overcome anything.

    photo It’s hard not to feel passionate with this effort. For me, when a nuclear family member came down with cancer this summer it was a real easy decision to slide on the yellow bracelet.

    Who doesn’t want to fight great challenges in life and be a winner? With Lance Armstrong’s Foundation, you can. And that’s why the nonprofit has almost 600,000 Facebook fans, has people all over the world sliding on yellow wrist bracelets (though I am told such things are out of fashion for any other cause) and donating money, and yes, just like that venerable brand Harley Davidson (FREEDOM!), it has people tattooing the brand on their bodies.

    LIVESTRONG has transcended social media tools, it’s cause, and perhaps even its founder to become a true movement. And it also has become one of the strongest brands in America, nonprofit or not.

    Brooke McMillan Breaks Down LIVESTRONG’s Online Effort

    mcmillanTH Brooke McMillan is the online community evangelist for the Lance Armstrong Foundation. Brooke started with the LAF in April of 2004 as the first LIVESTRONG SurvivorCare Coordinator helping thousands affected by cancer get educational information. Brooke reaches out proactively via online tools such as Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, LIVESTRONG.com, the LIVESTRONG Blog, Flicker, YouTube and more to build the community and raise awareness of the organization’s efforts.

    Q: How is it working with Lance Armstrong?

    A: He’s great. Very dedicated to the cause and to making cancer a priority all over the world. Walks the talk more than anyone Ive ever met.

    Q: How has social media benefitted the Lance Armstrong Foundation (LIVESTRONG)?

    A: I think it has sped up relationships with our supporters. Relationships with our supporters that would (in the past) have taken months or years to develop take much less time. Ive recruited folks all over the world to help in the fight against cancer, support LIVESTRONG and help their friends/family members deal with cancer…its humbling and awesome.

    Q: What’s your favorite social media tool?

    A: I like facebook- mostly because our fans are so great-600,000 people. Always something to talk about. Twitter has been good for us too. Spurred a lot of conversations that Ive been able to take, write about on our blog. Good stuff.

    Q: What new tools are you looking at?

    A: Using ustream for the first time at our global cancer summit this coming week. They are building out a special facebook ustream channel for us. Here’s the link to where the show will be http://www.ustream.tv/channel/livestrong-summit

    The tdf is always a crazy time for us. I was around when LA won the 7th tour in 2005 and honestly have been missing that pure energy that takes place around the office. As a team-it pumps us up. Reminds us why we are a truly unique organization and brings us together as a staff/as a movement. We have an international stage.

    Lance was able to get our message out to this huge audience. Nike gave us 15 videos to use as part of their “Its About You” campaign. The stories are all about people that have done amazing things after cancer or after a fight with another disease. 

    Content is king…especially when the content is as powerful as this stuff.—my favorite video in this series was either LIVESTRONG Films: Lance Mackey or LIVESTRONG Films: Sean. Watch them..you wont be sorry.

    Q: How do you see online media affecting societal change?

    A: Like I said above—social media speeds up the process of locating supporters, spreading our message, gathering feedback. Its still the same message as before, but the method of delivery has changed—we can also deliver that message really fast and to an enormous amount of people.

    It also lifts up that curtain that people hide behind—that fear of telling others about your cancer, your fears, sharing your story. This is especially important in countries where cancer is still highly stigmatized. We have been able to make positive strides in these countries by being online and accessible and engaging. That will be our crowning accomplishment I think.

    Q: What’s next for Brooke McMillan?

    A: This! I am exactly where I want to be. Can’t ask for anything more than that.

     

    @DCTwestival Beneficiary Miriam’s Kitchen Gets Social

    Jenn@DCTwestival is  right around the corner (September 10, register  today), and the beneficiary is Miriam’s Kitchen. Miriam’s Kitchen was chosen for a variety of reasons. Miriam’s Kitchen provides healthy, homemade meals and comprehensive case management services to the homeless (image from Miriam Kitchen’s Flickr feed). It has a healthy Twitter and general social media presence, but could benefit from some additional social media training and support.

    As a member of the DC Twestival planning committee, it seemed appropriate to interview Miriam’s Kitchen Head of Social Media Jennifer Roccanti about the event, and social media. And yeah, I asked some hardball questions for my marketing friends.

    Q: How does it feel to be the DC Twestival beneficiary?

    A: As an organization, we are so grateful to the Twestival committee for selecting us to benefit from this awesome event. It gives us the chance to meet new people and connect in person with those we’ve meet through twitter. Most importantly though, it allows us to make connections and raise money to continue providing high quality services to our guests.

    twestivalQ: What do you hope to get from DC Twestival (besides funds)?

    A: Everything we do is for our guests, the homeless men and women of Washington, DC. Twestival gives us another opportunity for us to share their stories with our community and to make connections with people who truly care. We are excited to build those connections at Twestival and bring even more people into the Miriam’s Kitchen community.

    Q: Your social media effort has been lauded by traditional media, but how have the online masses received you?

    A: The friends we’ve made through twitter are some of the most generous people I’ve ever met. @barleyandbirch, @kristymyers, @richdevans, @soapbuddy…those are just a few of the dozens of people on twitter who have made a difference in our guests ‘ lives. I can’t say enough about the community that has welcomed us on twitter. They are truly amazing.

    Q: I noticed you shoot a lot of links out on Twitter, but you don’t seem to engage in conversation. Is there a reason for that?

    A: We definitely do talk to our twitter community, we just do it through DM and email and in person. The reason we don’t do many @ replies is because it feeds onto the homepage of our website and while we have tried to filter out the @ replies from the feed, we haven’t had any luck yet. (if you know of anyone who can help us, let me know!).

    So…because people who aren’t familiar with twitter are seeing that feed on our website we felt it would be best to keep those conversations private. Also, since this is an organizational twitter page, we wanted to keep it as clean as possible and not have a jumble of @replies on our page that might not be interesting to anyone else.

    However, if someone on twitter deserves kudos for something they’ve done for our guests, we don’t hesitate to give them a shout out (hi @barleyandbirch!). Long story short, we do have conversations with our twitter community, we just choose to keep them mostly private.

    Q: So if social media is conversational, what do you think of the conversations you see online?

    A: We are fortunate to have been invited into those conversations, both positive and not so positive. For those not so positive conversations, we’ve been given the chance to tell our side of the story. To defend our way of doing things (which is always in the best interests of our guests). Conversely, those positive conversations give us an opportunity to give people a glimpse into the lives and struggles of our guests. It has become a powerful vehicle for telling their stories and we are so grateful for that.

    Q: What’s your favorite social media tool?

    A: Twitter. Hands down.

    Q: What’s next for Miriam’s Kitchen online?

    A: Continuing to build relationships online and bringing even more of those supporters into the Miriam’s Kitchen community off line. Integrating more video into the stories we tell. We are also working with some of our guests to help them get more acclimated with social media. So many of them are already online and a few are on Twitter, Facebook, etc… Social media gives them a way to tell their stories and to record their lives.

    They are so often ignored in public but social media allows them to even the playing field and be treated the way they should always be treated…with dignity and respect. I’d like to see what we can do with our guests and social media. I think they could really benefit. So stay tuned…

     

    Untapped Opportunity to Engage High Dollar Nonprofit Donors via Social

    Jen McClure originally ran this story on the New Communications Review site.

    SONY DSC

    The social web offers a welcome place for individual philanthropic activity (original homeless image by jlmccoy). New research funded by the Columbus Foundation, The San Francisco Foundation and The Saint Paul Foundation demonstrates that High dollar donors — especially 30-49 year-olds — use the social web, but have yet to be engaged by strong, trustworthy philanthropic organizations. This was among the key findings of the new research study, “Community Philanthropy 2.0,” conducted by Beth Kanter, myself (I am a Society for New Communications Research Fellow), and Qui Diaz.

    The full executive summary of the study is available for download.  This version has much more content and statistics than the version we ran on Mashable last Spring! The following is a brief summary…

    The Community Philanthropy 2.0 research study examined the use of social media by non-profits and causes, as well as existing donors and Internet “savvy” users’ traditional and social media usage patterns. The research was designed to determine if and how social media can be used to engage and cultivate high dollar donors. Objectives of the research included:

    • To determine if high dollar donors use social media
    • To see if those currently using social media could become potential high dollar donors
    • To examine if cultivation of high dollar donations is possible online
    • To determine what kinds of social media would serve this user base

    Key Findings

    The online world of charitable activity is highly social, but also fragmented. No dominant voice for charitable giving exists online, indicating the social web is still in an early phase of philanthropic activity.

    Online conversations rarely evolve into meaningful discussions about how nonprofits are achieving their missions and impacting society. Donors don’t advise other donors, and generally, philanthropic experts from foundations do not participate in these discussions. There is a need for a trusted source, and a lack of authoritative philanthropic conversations.

    The 30-49 age group represents the best fit to cultivate major donors using social media strategies.  More than 50 percent of 30 – 49-year-old survey respondents are interested in the following topics:

    • “Whether or not a nonprofit is successfully making an impact” (75%)
    • “Learning about organizations that are actively working on issues and causes I care about” (62%)
    • “Success stories and updates on the progress of nonprofits I support” (54%)
    • ”Information/updates on the issues and causes I care about” (54%)
    • “Financial accountability and governance of nonprofits I support” (51%)

    Eighty percent of the Internet-savvy respondents aged 30-49 reported that they would participate in social media with nonprofits if the information was highly credible and of strong quality, and 77 percent said they would participate if it came from a trusted source. Online community-oriented social media is a preferred tool over most other forms of online conversation.

    "The social web represents a tremendous opportunity for community foundations to shape local giving. High dollar donors use the social web, but have yet to be engaged by strong, trustworthy philanthropic organizations. Foundations and nonprofits in general simply need to determine the best means of participation," concludes the report.

    In addition, I have published a paper based on the findings in the upcoming issue of the Society for New Communications Research’s Journal of New Communications Research and will present the findings at the Society for New Communications Research’s Annual Research Symposium, which will take place November 5-6 at the Harvard Faculty Club in Cambr.  I hope you’ll join me for that!

     

    FORSCOM Speech in Tweets

    DSC_0329

    On Monday, CRT/tanaka President Mike Mulvihill and I had the great honor of discussing social media with the senior leadership of U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM), including Four Star General Campbell (pictured at the left) and Three Star Lt. General Pederson. FORSCOM is actively exploring how to best use social media for the benefit of 80% of U.S. Army forces, including some exciting ideas for keeping families engaged with deployed soldiers. You can see an early precursor of FORSCOM’s work on their Facebook page, which engages families with questions.

    DSC_0323

    It was an honor to serve our country for a day with this discussion. Thank you to Colonel Collins and his excellent public affairs staff for the opportunity.  The U.S. Army is blessed to have such talented, kind people working for it.

    While I did not write the speech out, FORSCOM did tweet the session.  Below find the tweets for an abstract view of our conversation…

    FORSCOM4

    FORSCOM3 

    FORSCOM2

    FORSCOM

     

    Creating Movements

    img_51cf4660-074c-4f50-945f-2e4ef04790d0.jpg

    This is an excerpt from my keynote speech this morning given to the Young Nonprofit Professionals Network’s “Social Media for Social Good conference.” Valeria Maltoni wrote a great post with the same title featuring ten tips on creating movements just two days ago. Her post was based off of the Brains of Fire Manifesto, “10 Lessons Learned in Igniting Word of Mouth Movements.” Both posts influenced this speech.

    Those of us that communicate for nonprofits find ourselves at a crossroads. The new social tools that we are here to discuss are not so new anymore. We’ve seen successes like Barack Obama’s incredible rise to the Presidency. Dynamic movements such as the Iraqi election. And frustrating challenges like fighting off big oil’s influence on the ever delayed climate change bill otherwise known as Waxman Markey.

    There have the been the well discussed successes like DonorsChoose and Lil Green Patch. There are the ongoing efforts to fight Swine Flu, or new successes like LiveStrong. And the many, many hyper local and niche causes that touch the lives of their online communities not by the millions, but by the hundreds or thousands everyday.

    If you are like me, you are asked all the time to use these media to create movements. BUT.

    Yes, that difficult word, BUT.

    We are asked to do it in controlled environments. We are asked to ensure brand and message quality. We are asked to contain those people and make sure they do what we want, and also ensure only the “good” ideas are accepted. We are asked to deliver #s of hits or followers. We are asked to master ever evolving technologies. And we are asked to do it with little or no resources. Ironically, if we have time, the last matter is the least difficult.

    And that is the crossroads. Movements versus campaigning. Creating open communities with old siloed corporate structures. And yes nonprofits mimic their corporate brethren with siloed structures.

    How can you tell the difference? It’s easy. If we are successful, we’re being talked about, rather than talking. People are writing their own stories and ideas about our cause rather than us publishing content. Tweet conversations about you happen instead of links from your Twitter account. Networks, groups, applications, conversations, meet-ups, T-shirts, donations, volunteer events and political actions receive community wide support and in many cases are created by the community itself.

    See, the mark of a great social media effort is when the community itself owns it. We can light the match, we can use lighter fluid and kindling, we can fan the flames, but only the community can make our issue, our movement, burn with the full fire of an inferno.

    Movements involve people, not Marketing, PR, Comms, Public Affairs, etc., etc. Our job as organizational communicators lies in trying to facilitate a larger conversation by providing the means for people to share, perhaps initiate conversations, and highlight the great work and thoughts of others. But we cannot use these tools to dictate the movement. And that means we must lead our organizations into a new era of communications.

    The classic mistake of organizations is to apply the very old publishing content and messages approach to the not so new social media. Don’t make that mistake. And control? Please, why even bother? If you want to control then you don’t understand people, and you are in the wrong business. Get out now. My experience has informed me over and over again that you will fail. Yet, our executives and managers, our internal stakeholders cannot understand the open culture.

    Listen before participating, and participate before publishing. Publish shareable information instead of dictating messages. Create relationships instead of transactions. This may as well be Sanskrit to many organizational leaders. And so you are not just asked to change the world, but also your organizations. Patience and consistent efforts, showing results over projects, over periods of time, and most importantly, with newly engaged stakeholders.

    Never forget that this is about exciting and enabling people to carry forth the most noble of charges, your cause. You want them to tell their friends over dinner, buy that bumper sticker, make the logo their screen saver, provide an unexpected donation, go out and take pictures, and/or ask their CEO if they can send an email to the company.

    See, a movement compels someone to make your cause a part of their life, not just their Facebook profile. It’s always better to have 500 people screaming your wares than 5,000 passive followers who don’t care. Never forget that, either.

    Going back to the climate change bill. I cannot help but think of the green movement, and its failure to transcend the environmentalist and conservation movements to the point that American households are doing everything they can to become green. The great failure with Waxman Markey is not how watered down it has become, that big oil is winning, that the bill may never pass. It’s that our congressional representatives can get away with this. The movement is not strong enough.

    I began our talk today with my personal nonprofit history. You know I believe this is our generation’s greatest challenge, as great as the fascist threat that faced our grandparents.

    It is my hope, my prayer that I can use these god given communication skills, our not so new world of participatory media, and make green something so compelling that it cannot help but become an all powerful movement. I envision a time when people will gladly pay more for green technology, and they will consciously try to reduce their carbon footprint everyday. When disgraces like the Waxman Markey fiasco occur, they will be outraged with their political representatives and demand change, again and again until the right people are in office who will defend our world.

    As you go into your sessions today, I ask you to think not about how to get 1000 people into your Facebook groups. Instead, how can you use your Facebook group to engage your fellows, change your work environment, and spark your movement.

     

    Upcoming Speaking Engagements and Events

    6010_102874816684_728506684_2606826_1786129_n-1.jpg

    I’ve got a few speaking engagements coming up over the next few weeks, plus here are a couple more interesting events, too. Here we go:

    On Thursday in Washington, I am keynoting the Young Nonprofit Professionals Network’s “Social Media for Social Good conference.” This sold-out event promises to create 150 jazzed up, super excited communicators out to change the world.

    In addition, on Wednesday through Thursday DC nonprofit folks will be attending the Bridge conference. I hope to see you there tomorrow!

    On Monday next week, I will be in Montreal (a little R&R) and am participating in an informal lunch tweet-up. If you are in town, please touch base with Adele McAlear for information.

    Kevin Dugan and Richard Laermer are increasing their Bad Pitch Blog efforts and having a tele-seminar for anyone who needs to improve their media relations — and by default social media. It’s called “Bad Pitch Night School (During The Day).” More details are at their demi-famous NEW url, http://crappypr.com, and it’s on Wednesday, July 29 from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.EDT. The duo is giving out – count them – 10 free scholarships to some folks between jobs and some students who are student-like. And every registrant receives a free, electronic copy of “Full Frontal PR,” which, as Richard says, doesn’t suck.

    Comcast is hosting its Social Media Seminar for Nonprofit Executives on August 4-5 in Philadelphia. This one has a pretty serious line-up of heavy hitters. I will be appearing on the panel dedicated to Choosing Your Social Media Strategy.”

    Another conference full of heavy hitters: Mashable’s Social Good Conference is this August 28 in New York City. At this conference, I will be speaking on Social Media for Social Good again.

    Finally, DC Twestival will be held on September 10 here in Washington. Place is yet to be determined, but our charitable beneficiary will be Miriam’s Kitchen, an organization that feeds and provides case management services to the homeless. I am working on the committee for this fall’s event, and promise more details. Until then, please save the date.

     

    Answers About, Insights Into the @childfund Twitter Effort

    2983428610_92f0c39f2d

    There have been several interesting posts and comments that have arisen about the @childfund Twitter campaign.  Specifically, people have questioned the funding of the effort, and the rising trend of providing a reward for following (Fishing Pond Construction image by ChildFund Australia).

    For context, in summary of last Friday’s post:  To celebrate rebranding from the Christian Children’s Fund, ChildFund International is giving gifts of agricultural love and hope from the organization’s gift catalog for every 200 Twitter followers @childfund receives.  These efforts will directly benefit children in Gambia, Zambia, Kenya and Ethiopia. There is no cap on followers, and the offer will continue through July 27.

    Funding

    OK, on to the controversy: On Twitter and later in a  blog post, Colin Carmichael questioned the funding of the effort:

    I’m guessing that ChildFund International set aside a specific amount of money for this campaign to be donated at those 200 follower increments. Note that this is money/aid that ChildFund International already has since they aren’t asking for donations from those followers. My suspicion is that the aid in question was destined for Africa regardless of how many followers @ChildFund gets.

    It was my wrong assumption that the money had been allocated of the marketing budget instead of advertising. In actuality, ChildFund International reached out to donors who have said they will fund this campaign. This is above the amount they usually give.

    To be clear: The Twitter campaign isn’t about raising money, either. It’s about raising awareness of the work that ChildFund does for deprived, excluded and vulnerable children in the 31 countries where we work.

    And it’s more than sponsoring gifts for followers to reach out and spam folks. ChildFund has promised to report back to its Twitter followers who have invested. We designed the effort to attract followers that want to see firsthand how the money can make a difference. Twitter followers can expect open dialogue from @childfund as well as reports in the form of  photos, videos and the stories of those who received the gifts. In short, it’s a two way give and take.

    Alex’s Post

    Friend and Changeblogger Alexandra Rampy has noticed a trend of the reward for follow effort.  We discussed this, too, when the United Nations Environmental Programme planted a tree for every Twitter follower. Alex’s analysis offered seven tips:

    1. Wait
    2. Set realistic and attainable benchmarks
    3. Mirror realistic rewards
    4. Extend the initiative
    5. Keep momentum
    6. Make it fun
    7. Follow-up

    First of all, Alex had some great points in her post.  I want to acknowledge that. We did or are planning to act along most of these steps. Here are some deeper insights into the ChildFund effort as it applies to Alex’s post.

    Wait: We could not, unfortunately. Rebranding ChildFund demanded an immediate effort to move capital from the old name to the new effort in a rapid fashion.  In many ways, because Twitter is but the first part of a plan for building a social web community the rest of the year, we wanted to do this first and attract followers quickly. In order to extend the initiative,  we need an interested community.

    Attainable benchmarks and realistic rewards: I like what Alex said about 500k followers and a reward of the same fashion.  We have no stated goal, just a hope to attract a strong vibrant community.  I’d rather see 1,500 rapid fans than 150,000 uninterested followers who don’t do anything. Thus it’s an open ended WOM, opt-in initiative that will run for the rest of the month.

    Based on cost per gift we felt that 200 followers was the correct benchmark per gift.  Keep in mind followers are not leads, they are people who will give us a chance to maybe, just maybe become a long term Twitter community member.

    I like providing a reward in social media. Too many marketing efforts ask you to follow and give nothing back to the follower. Whether it’s a donation and a commitment to report back like this or some other type of give, people need to be rewarded. Social media demands a two-way relationship, not abuse of followers.  Call it a return on freely given social capital.

    Follow-up: We hope to build a long-term community with @childfund’s followers. There’s some commonality: Wanting to help children in impoverished countries. A dialogue along those lines seems possible. To succeed, @childfund Twitterer David Hylton and later a new community manager will engage with people in real and meaningful conversations. It’s our hope that people on @childfund’s stream are already seeing Dave talk with, not at them.

    Alex has agreed to interview @childfund for more insights into the campaign so stay tuned. And thanks to the many people who have already provided their support for this effort. Please continue spreading the word to your friends.

     

    Follow @childfund and Help Change Children’s Lives

    3617408507_d99b698f69

    ChildFund International just rebranded from the Christian Children’s Fund last week as an effort to demonstrate a singular commitment to children’s welfare today and tomorrow (image: Faith Smiling by ChildFund, NZ). Along with the new brand are new Twitter (@childfund), Facebook, blogging and YouTube efforts.

    To celebrate, ChildFund International is giving gifts of agricultural love and hope from the organization’s gift catalog for every 200 Twitter followers @childfund receives.  These efforts will directly benefit children in Gambia, Zambia, Kenya and Ethiopia. There is no cap on on followers, and the offer will continue through July 27. 

    Each country has different needs so the gifts vary:

    • Chickens for a school in the Gambia
    • A goat for a family farm in Zambia
    • Mango trees in Kenya
    • Vegetable seeds in Ethiopia

    As part of the effort, ChildFund International is sending Flip cameras to program directorate offices in each of the four countries to report back.  They will share the recipients’ stories and photos with the social web. ChildFund wants to show folks how their efforts and these items benefit children and their communities. It is also a commitment not to simply promote, but to continue an accountable dialog with the social web.

    So tell your friends.  By simply following @childfund we can all make a difference in a child’s life.

    ChildFund enlisted our help with this effort.  It’s an honor to work with them to help bring their new brand to life on the social web, and work to directly benefit children in these four countries. The organization has served children since 1938 and helps 15.2 million children and family members in 31 countries.