Livingston

Nov
12
2007

Culture Shock

Businesses facing the changing landscape of media consumption must reckon with the increasingly two-way nature of today’s world. Two-way (a.k.a. social media, conversational media, etc.) creates massive challenges for corporations that are indoctrinated in the one-way control culture.  This inevitably causes culture shock, fear and sometimes clashes. 

0,,5223157,00

Culture clash: This ad promoting local beaches did not fare so well in Turkey. Clearly, the advertiser didn’t understand its community.

Experimentation or first time “social” media initiatives by command and control cultures usually fail. Results range from falling flat to causing outright brand suicide, at least online.  Consider some of the ways one-way business cultures try to approach social media:

  • Astroturfing: Lying with fake social media efforts rarely makes it in the social media world (see Astroturfing on the Dark Side of the Moon).  In the case of Walmart, the company still hasn’t recovered.
  • Turning a Deaf Ear: This follows the mindset that bloggers aren’t credible “If we ignore the blogs and social networks, they’ll go away.” Dell Hell and Fed Ex are great examples of how this can really hurt a company.
  • Same Old Approach:  The is the most common form of corporate misstep, and also the least talked about (low drama factor).  Same old approach involves trying to provide controlled communications — press releases, produced videos, brochure copy, etc., etc. — through social media realms.  The end result is often deaf ears with an unengaged community.

There’s so much to be gained from actively participating in social media.  Consider how dynamic IBM’s culture has become with its many, many blogs (more than 30k , including internal blogs), and microblogging, lifestream and incredible Second Life initiatives. Their culture is rapidly evolving to become two-way. Social media as a communications form certainly isn’t hurting the bottom line for Big Blue: $69.9 billion through the first 3Q 2007 compared to $65.2 billion in 2006.

Yet most companies’ cultures prevent them from truly embracing a conversational form with their markets and themselves.  For me, whenever I engage a company in discussions about social media tools, rarely do we discuss cost or tactics.  Instead, the discussion revolves around culture. Unless they can change their cultural approach to communications, and innovate to meet the medium, their tactics will fail.

Changes on the Inside

Corporate culture must change to meet the form if companies intend to be successful.  Invariably, the discussion becomes how to best engage a community (which is chapter three of Now Is Gone).  Here are some very recent examples from prospective and current client discussions:

Listen and understand. As in know what your customers care about. Hint: It’s probably not what the company cares about. Once a company understands this, they should write/create for them. Don’t waste the community’s time with corporate drivel and press releases.  Simple, right? Wrong, most companies fight this.  It’s the heart of command and control.

Be real. Messages can be introduced through social media, but you better be sure that the messages are meant to serve the community.  You cannot control people in real life, nor can you in business life. Be prepared, and even welcome feedback.

Inject some personality into the content.  That means reinventing most corporate communications departments’ polishing processes.  By the time they are done polishing, a document may be safe, on message, perfect from grammatical standpoint, and about as interesting as a dissertation on modern calculus (sorry Ike).

Hard selling should be left to car salesmen. No you cannot use social media to blatantly push your products all the time. Even Guy Kawasaki found this out on Twitter. Look, it’s OK to push now and then (consider today’s other post on Now Is Gone availability online), but be transparent, tongue in cheek, and let it go. 

Community means being a  part of, and to do that, organizations need to serve, not sell. So if you’re selling all the time, or even a healthy minority of the time, do not expect a strong community.

For more on how to engage a community, read the Seven Principles of Community Building.

6 Responses to “Culture Shock”

  • Jim Hathaway Says:

    In my own experience much of the challenge is that with social media, corporations are being asked to take much on faith. It’s a very non-linear world, and a lot harder to visualize than more linear direct tactics. Connecting the dots takes some vision and imagination.

  • Lewis Green Says:

    Geoff,

    I think that the most important point above is the one regarding a company’s culture. Social Media will launch much more easily within businesses where the culture has ownership in success; where executives and workers are in the same game; and where executives share information freely and encourage employees to take responsibility for success. Within that kind of culture, the use of social media will be profitable, authentic and innovative.

  • Connie Bensen Says:

    Hi Geoff,
    Love the glaring example that you provided! It is so important to know your audience.

    Can I take the ‘be real’ one step further? I think that marketers need to ‘be themselves’. But to do this they’ll really need to understand their customers, the conversation, and the methods of communication. So listening is very important!

  • Ike Says:

    Great post! But hey now, a little quantum mechanics and Venn diagrams never hurt anyone.

    And could you amend the link? “Sorry Ike” isn’t SEO-friendly anchor text…

  • Geoff Livingston Says:

    Connie: How true… How few companies listen, and what does that say about their products.

    Lewis and Jim: Spot on.

    Ike: SEO? What’s that?

    Thanks all for coming by!

  • Bill Jolly Says:

    The movement from “Command and Control” to PR2.0 is going to be painful. The process seems to start with grass roots efforts within a corporation. You are right on in that it is an overall corporate culture shift. IMO, the conversation definitely needs to go to the Executive suite in order to have any chance at success.

Leave a Reply