<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questioning WIRED&#8217;s &#8220;Carbon Blindness&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/</link>
	<description>Musings and analysis on marketing, buzz and communications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:31:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/comment-page-1/#comment-52740</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/#comment-52740</guid>
		<description>Alain,

Well said.  Now how do we get policy makers in place who understand the implications of the need for a holistic approach to this problem.  What a question, indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alain,</p>
<p>Well said.  Now how do we get policy makers in place who understand the implications of the need for a holistic approach to this problem.  What a question, indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: friarminor</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/comment-page-1/#comment-48539</link>
		<dc:creator>friarminor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/#comment-48539</guid>
		<description>Environment is an ecosystem thingy.  Every thing&#039;s connected.    Best treatment approach is holistic, much like the human body.

Thanks for pointing it out, Geoff.

Best.
alain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environment is an ecosystem thingy.  Every thing&#8217;s connected.    Best treatment approach is holistic, much like the human body.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing it out, Geoff.</p>
<p>Best.<br />
alain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Livingston</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/comment-page-1/#comment-48456</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/#comment-48456</guid>
		<description>Settling for anything is not going to work, Lynn.  Momentum is good, but if we solve one problem, a symptom, even as big as carbon footprints, we will only be putting our finger in the dike, waiting for the next leak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Settling for anything is not going to work, Lynn.  Momentum is good, but if we solve one problem, a symptom, even as big as carbon footprints, we will only be putting our finger in the dike, waiting for the next leak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn from Organicmania.com</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/comment-page-1/#comment-48296</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn from Organicmania.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2008/05/25/questioning-wireds-carbon-blindness/#comment-48296</guid>
		<description>Geoff,

With this being Memorial Day weekend (no babysitting!), I havenâ€™t read the entire article but I did read the intro and the counterpoint and a few of the sections.  Let&#039;s face it, even if there are some things you disagree with, the article accomplished a huge objective by inspiring you to twitter and blog about it -  drawing greater attention to global warming. 

The problem is that even environmentalists are not taking global warming seriously enough. Thereâ€™s a ton of focus on the 3 Rs (reduce, reuse, recycle) but not enough on global warming, which is the single most important issue we face. Global warming is scary and inconvenient, and people donâ€™t want to deal with it. Look at the G-8 â€“ they canâ€™t even reach agreement on it. Fact is, nothing else matters if we canâ€™t join together to combat global warming. (And I&#039;m not suggesting that we abandon the other battles, but global warming is not getting the attention it deserves).  

I value your opinion, Geoff, so I donâ€™t doubt your assessment that WIRED went over the edge in this article, but frankly, many in the environmental movement are at the point where ANYTHING any one can do to draw attention to global warming is fine by them.

The road to raising consciousness of global warming is a long one. Most people start with issues that concern them personally â€“ this is where organics comes into the picture, as people realize that the personal care products we put on our bodies and the food we eat are loaded with toxins. (and to Wired&#039;s point, plenty of us are eating organic AND local). Then comes awareness of other environmental issues. Sometimes I blog about global warming, but rather than change the focus of my blog, I  spend a lot of time on my friend Margueriteâ€™s blog,  which I highly recommend to anyone interested in following the battle against climate change: 

http://lamarguerite.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff,</p>
<p>With this being Memorial Day weekend (no babysitting!), I havenâ€™t read the entire article but I did read the intro and the counterpoint and a few of the sections.  Let&#8217;s face it, even if there are some things you disagree with, the article accomplished a huge objective by inspiring you to twitter and blog about it &#8211;  drawing greater attention to global warming. </p>
<p>The problem is that even environmentalists are not taking global warming seriously enough. Thereâ€™s a ton of focus on the 3 Rs (reduce, reuse, recycle) but not enough on global warming, which is the single most important issue we face. Global warming is scary and inconvenient, and people donâ€™t want to deal with it. Look at the G-8 â€“ they canâ€™t even reach agreement on it. Fact is, nothing else matters if we canâ€™t join together to combat global warming. (And I&#8217;m not suggesting that we abandon the other battles, but global warming is not getting the attention it deserves).  </p>
<p>I value your opinion, Geoff, so I donâ€™t doubt your assessment that WIRED went over the edge in this article, but frankly, many in the environmental movement are at the point where ANYTHING any one can do to draw attention to global warming is fine by them.</p>
<p>The road to raising consciousness of global warming is a long one. Most people start with issues that concern them personally â€“ this is where organics comes into the picture, as people realize that the personal care products we put on our bodies and the food we eat are loaded with toxins. (and to Wired&#8217;s point, plenty of us are eating organic AND local). Then comes awareness of other environmental issues. Sometimes I blog about global warming, but rather than change the focus of my blog, I  spend a lot of time on my friend Margueriteâ€™s blog,  which I highly recommend to anyone interested in following the battle against climate change: </p>
<p><a href="http://lamarguerite.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lamarguerite.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
