Livingston

Jan
13
2008

Campaign Social Media Languishing?

Both B.L. Ochman and Li Evans have questioned both the Republican and Democrat campaigners lack of social media engagement. And it’s true. Blogs are canned, they don’t communicate the actual campaign life very well, and we get very little what I would call "genuine" or authentic campaign insights.

Similarly, social network usage is also canned. See Barrack Obama’s twitter page or his MySpace effort. Republican side, consider supposed social media guru Ron Paul’s Twitter feed.  Read’s like political billboards to me. Or Huckabee’s campaigners spinning the evangelist on YouTube.

480629716_f8a62cbc77 For me, it comes down to control.  Political PR revolves around command and control, and most of these candidates will not give it up.  Controlling the message can be a maniacal endeavor for these organizations, and enabling independent voices to speak on behalf of a candidate as they feel and see issues runs contrary to campaign PR strategies. As a result, like Shel says, you really don’t get a good feel for these people (Image credit: KCIvey).

That doesn’t mean the campaigns are not using social media.  On the contrary, they do use it for controlled communications. They are most certainly monitoring it actively, often researching their competitors and seizing opportunities to attack inconsistencies in message outreach.

There are moments of brilliance, too. Mike Hucakabee wisely refers people from his canned blog to the many bloggers his campaign sanctions

In addition, Washington PR types will often use advocacy groups to shelter their efforts, and attack on particular issues.  Unfortunately, without disclosure this astroturfing practice can be quite misleading. Remember the Swift Boat attack ads that undermined John Kerry? More on DC’s astroturfing mentality tomorrow.

At the same time, elections are great opportunities for political bloggers to hash out issues and for advocacy groups to shine. Consider the McLovin spot that’s gotten more than 600K views on YouTube (The spot encourages youth to register and vote). Or Paulitics recent swipe on Christian evangelism in the U.S., which was "Dugg" by more than 3,000 people (present company included). Or this highly succesful post painting the current administration’s census efforts as trying to invade your privacy.

Back to the campaigners themselves, it will probably take an act of desperation in a losing campaign to cause a candidate to loosen the message control and unleash the power of social media.  By then, it may be too late to harness the true power of the Long Tail.

5 Responses to “Campaign Social Media Languishing?”

  • Jake Says:

    Great post - I think for the campaign sites and blogs themselves, they are already set where they are going to be in terms of search and social integration. The work that they have done in the past 18 months has pretty much determined where they are now and will be going forward, most of them do not leverage Search and Social that well AT ALL. Twitter is one thing that they should all focus on going forward in the primaries for it’s “real time” capabilities.

  • Lauren Vargas Says:

    This time last year, Dallas SMC discussed social media and politics. Supposedly, social media would define the the election. I am sticking to original thought…You can’t engineer naturalness. Until candidates get it the posts will be bland and canned.

  • Geoff Livingston Says:

    Yeah, it’s a shame in general, and on Twitter. Real potential for a day in the life of kind of tweeting. Thanks for coming by Jake and Lauren.

  • Justin Thorp Says:

    When I see politicians use social media, I usually get pissed off because I feel like I’m getting talked down to. As you said it’s not genuine. The candidates think social media is hip and cool and will woo the support of the youngin’s. I look forward to seeing a candidate who will take it seriously.

  • Federal Social Media Accelerates » The Buzz Bin Says:

    [...] use of social media in the [...]

Leave a Reply