2008 Buzz Bin and Now Is Gone Editorial Missions

With the new year on the horizon, we’re slightly retooling content on both the Buzz Bin and the Now Is Gone blogs.  These blogs are meant to serve the communications and business communities so I wanted to give readers an opportunity to comment on the missions. If you’d like to see different content, please comment!

Buzz Bin 2008 Mission

Provide a discussion on PR, social media, marketing and the evolving conversation. This is more of an insiders’ blog for those that have experienced social media within the larger communications toolset. Topics range from strategy and tactics to news commentary and trend analysis. The discussion should involve all members of Livingston Communications, as well as weekly interviews with a wide variety of experts to provide context and different viewpoints.

Scheduled Author Line-up

  • Monday – Geoff Livingston: Thought leadership piece
  • Tuesday a.m. – Great blogs of fire (Larissa Fair)
  • Tuesday p.m. – District of Corruption on BlogTalkRadio at 2 p.m. Show to provide commentary and analysis on current industry events. Hosted by Technosailor’s Aaron Brazell and Geoff Livingston. 
  • Wednesday – Larissa Fair on social media
  • Wednesday or Thursday p.m. – Geoff Livingston commentary piece
  • Thursday – Interview (conducted by Geoff and Larissa)
  • Friday – Michele Capots on PR

Additional Contributions

  • Guest posts
  • Geoff Livingston: Random posts

Now Is Gone2008 Mission

Continue serving as a primer for those business executives new to social media or considering engaging with these new communications tools. The conversation should be educational, pragmatic and weigh the pros and cons of social media to provide an authentic, genuine viewpoint of social media marketing. We believe in social media’s potential to better communications, but do not think it will replace traditional tactics. Instead we believe social media will be integrated into the larger marketing mix and may influence change in other disciplines.

Scheduled Author Line-up

  • Monday – Geoff Livingston: Social media primer or analysis
  • Tuesday – Ike Pigott: Social media commentary
  • Thursday – Professor Lauren Vargas: Education, social media commentary, communications theory

Additional Contributions

  • Brian Solis: Manifestos, commentary and initiatives
  • Geoff Livingston: Blogger of the month, Now Is Gone news, and random posts
 

Rejoining the AdAge 150

Last September I asked AdAge to delist the Buzz Bin for several reasons, but mostly because I felt the system favored older blogs with too much emphasis on historic Bloglines accounts and not enough on recent performance.

ToddAnd and Charles Moran listened. AdAge added Alexa page rank and re-calibrated rankings to make a more complete picture. So we relisted.  The Buzz Bin was ranked at 230 before this change, and now we’re at 128. That’s a 100 points because of these changes.

I am not a huge fan of the subjective measure (even though the Bin benefits with a high score), and the blog still has a relatively low BlogLines score, but overall a significant change.128 More importantly, I respect AdAge and in particular Todd and Charles because they listened.

I will continue to support organizations that listen through social media channels.  That’s why I finally ordered my Dell computer last week. And that’s why the Buzz Bin will remain a fixture on the AdAge 150 no matter where we rank. It is clear to me that AdAge wants to serve this community.

 

To Twit or Not to Twit

I am the anti twit, at least that’s what they’re calling me. I am the only one in the office not on Twitter and not really sure I see the point of it. I’m not sure what I would say that would be worth “following.”

This past Monday we were in New York City, Trenton, NJ and Philadelphia all in one fell swoop. New York happened so fast it was a blur. Brian Williams was twittering in the back seat, ‘on our way to Philly, pouring rain, don’t think we’ll make it in time,’ ‘On the NJ transit, bumpy ride.’

That day was silly and adventurous all at the same time and worthy, as far as I can tell, of twittering. Every five minutes we were doing something different.

But every day’s not like that. What do i say, ‘Just had my morning Diet Coke, ready to face the day.’ Do tweets really care? Still, I do realize I’m missing out by not engaging with a community.

I have a Facebook and LinkedIn profile, do I really need to Twitter? All week I have been told that I should think about it, from Brian to Kami Huyse to Geoff to Larissa.

So I’m thinking about it.

In 2008, that is my first dilemma, to twit or not to twit.

 

Debbie Weil Discusses Social Media in China

DebbieWeil This week we had the opportunity to catch up with corporate blogging expert Debbie Weil. Debbie is a good friend of ours based in D.C., and her book, The Corporate Blogging Book was recently published in Mandarin Chinese, prompting her to travel to China for a book tour. She comes back to us with a lot of great insight to share about the similarities and differences in social media between China and the United States.

BB: What’s the state of social media in China?

DW: It’s exploding. First, there are the sheer numbers: 162 million Internet users.

That puts China right behind – or almost even with – the U.S., which has an estimated Internet user population of 165 million to 210 million, depending on whom you believe.

Blogs are big. There are 30 million of them in China, according to some estimates. But discussion or bulletin boards, known as BBS, along with email and IMing, are even bigger. Everyone in the middle class uses BBS – to express themselves, to network, to learn. Sharon, the guide I hired to take me to the Great Wall, told me she met her husband online, in a discussion forum for those who’ve studied abroad.

Jason Ge, general manager of channel & marketing sales for Sina.com, China’s major portal and BSP (blog services provider), told me the site gets 300 million page views a day. Jason and I were on an Ad-tech Beijing panel together, along with Des Walsh.

And yes there are Chinese CEO blogs. Here’s a short list I compiled of Chinese CEO and corporate blogs. The CEOs who blog tend to be publicity-seeking. Think Mark Cuban.

BB: What was your biggest take away from the China book tour?

DW: The red-hot sense of possibility. I loved it. The energy, enthusiasm and entrepreneurialism amongst the professionals I met – both exp-pats and native Chinese – was astounding. China reminds me of America – especially the exhilaration of the dot com era. We know that China’s economy is exploding. The growth is palpable. You can feel it: factories are cranking; huge buildings are sprouting. Everybody is working 24X7.

If I could live a different life I’d move to Beijing or Shanghai, learn to speak Mandarin fluently and work there as an ex-pat. Oh yeah, my take away? I want to go back and dig deeper. You can’t possibly understand China after a two-week trip. Here’s a list I compiled of best resources to learn about social media in China.

BB: How is commenting different?

DW: Again, the sheer numbers. The Chinese are comment crazy. But you need to put commenting in a bucket that includes all kinds of posting online. The population of the US is just over 300 million. The population of China is over 1.3 billion, or 20% of the world’s population. As Sharon Ruwart, CEO of Elsevier Science & Technology China told me after I spoke at AmCham China in Beijing: “Just put two zeroes next to anything you’re accustomed to.”

So instead of 10 comments, think 1000 comments. When she started blogging for Elsevier she posted a first entry that said simply: “I’m starting a blog.” She didn’t publicize it in any way. She immediately got seven comments. Sharon and her husband moved to Beijing three years ago and are among the new group of older ex-pats.

When the Forbidden Starbucks drama unfolded (a Starbucks was formerly located inside Beijing’s Forbidden City palace; it has since moved), it was mentioned on a TV newcaster’s blog, then picked up and discussed thousands of times in discussion groups. The ripple effect? Close to 3,000 comments on one blog post about it.

BB: How do the Chinese fight off authoritarian control of their sites?

DW: They don’t “fight it off” per se. The government’s cyber-police are always there. Self-censorship comes naturally. But so do entrepreneurialism and a certain amount of risk-taking. Everyone knows about proxy servers like Anonymouse.org. They’re also accustomed to sudden and unexplained shutdowns of sites like YouTube.

That happened while I was there. Everyone felt it was connected to Google’s (ill-advised) decision to launch YouTube China during the Party Congress that was held the week of Oct. 15, 2007 in Beijing. (Has YouTube China been launched – ? I can’t find it.) The explosion in the use of the Internet – despite censorship – is a fascinating part of the contradictions that define China.

BB: What should the U.S. learn from China?

DW: Not to be complacent. That our utterly unfettered self-expression is precious. But to look to China for energy and possibility. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this is the China Century. If you have a chance to visit, go.

BB: After blogging, what’s your favorite social media form?

DW: My new iPhone. I’m captivated by it: the expanding and shrinking photos; the text messages in bubbles; the voicemail that automatically plays back for you. Oops… wait, an iPhone isn’t social media. I guess I have a love/hate relationship with Facebook. I’m fascinated by the concentric and expanding linkages it creates between and amongst communities. And the blurring of personal with professional. I’m wary, however, about the lack of privacy and of course appalled by Facebook’s recent misstep in how it launched Beacon for advertisers.

BB: What’s next for Debbie Weil?

DW: I’ve got some big ideas. I want to go back to China and work with multi-nationals on implementing social media strategies. I’m working on that. But as long as you’re asking… at some point I’d like to move outside the corporate realm. I would like to create the programmatic piece of Nicholas Negroponte’s One Laptop Per Child.

What should these kids do with their laptops? I want to teach kids all over the world how to write clearly by using a blog. How to network and empower themselves and their families by tapping into the global online economy.

I believe in the power of words. Blogs and other online channels are just a new place to deploy them. If anyone’s got great contacts at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, or another appropriate resource for executing a big idea, let me know.

 

PR’s Ridiculous Identity Crisis

identity-crisis-3-cropped An interesting comments chat with Rich Becker on the definitions of PR led to this post.  Despite all of the PR experts out there, no one can come up with a set definition for what it is.  And that extends to our supposed industry leading bodies and resources as authoritative as Webster’s dictionary (Image from Eucastrophe).

Consider these definitions from various sources:

PRSA says a lot, which seems to be too much.  Here’s an excerpt: “Public relations helps our complex, pluralistic society to reach decisions and function more effectively by contributing to mutual understanding among groups and institutions. It serves to bring private and public policies into harmony.”

How about a second PRSA definition, “Public relations helps an organization and its publics adapt mutually to each other.”

IABC’s content is password protected, so no obvious “guidance” there. No obvious definition on the Institute for Public Relations.

“Public Relations is the art and science of analyzing trends, predicting their consequences, counseling organization leaders and implementing planned programs of action which will serve both the organization’s and the public interest.” — First World Assembly of Public Relations Associations and First World Forum of Public Relations, 1978

“Relations with the general public as through publicity; specifically those functions of a corporation, organization, etc. concerned with attempting create favorable public opinion for itself.” — Websters, 1996 Collegiate edition

“The actions of a corporation, store, government, individual, etc., in promoting goodwill between itself and the public, the community, employees, customers, etc.” — Dictionary.com

How about Answers.com? “The art or science of establishing and promoting a favorable relationship with the public.”

No wonder why there are so many crazy conversations about what PR is and isn’t.  We’re a bunch of “communicators” that can’t get our message straight.  What a joke!  There can be no definitive right or wrong with this many disparate views.

Personally, I see public relations as a wide variety of actions (see the PR Long Tail) to foster goodwill between an organization and  its stakeholders.  I really like what Bill Sledzik had to say about PR, and believe that the true public relations pro must represent both parties, the community and the organization trying to communicate.

Bill’s comments:

“PR professionals must live with one foot inside the organization and one foot outside it. We must advocate for our clients but also for the stakeholders they impact. We walk a fine line between organizational goals and goals of society — kind of like an ombudsman or arbiter.”

What is your definition of PR?

 

Second (and Third) Chances for Change

46251172-00000-00ef0-400cb8e1Will the competition between Target and Wal-Mart come to a head over social media? Last year, we saw the result of Wal-Mart’s astroturfing incident with their blog and Edelman’s not so transparent assistance. More recently, Target Rounders has come out, and once again the public (bloggers and consumers alike) is left with a sour taste in their mouths from the corporate giant’s attempt at manipulating the message.

Wal-Mart is certainly a case study for what NOT to do in social media, but even with all of the bumps along the way, can they come back and truly start over, receiving genuine feedback and engaging in conversation with their consumers? Perhaps with the controversy over Target Rounders, it’s prime time for Wal-Mart to get back in the game. With the launch of their new blog, Check Out, Wal-Mart is trying again.

Target was the good brand that could do no wrong, with a growing reputation and success. Maybe the fact that Wal-Mart’s brand and reputation was more well known, therefore making it a bigger target (no pun intended) for criticism, gave Target had the upper hand. But digging a little deeper shows that Target has just as many problems.

Though Wal-Mart may (or may not) have learned from their mistakes, they keep trying to prove their willingness to listen and engage their customers. Hopefully Wal-Mart will be able to get it right this time, and really become a part of the community, as we have seen with Dell, SouthWest, and other companies that have successfully engaged the public through their blogs (and willingness to acknowledge their downfalls).

Perhaps it’s just the nature of these big corporations that they will experience up and down periods, but I think that Target should have known better. You can’t claim to be social network savvy and assume that people are going to play by your rules, as Target Rounders did on Facebook. This is further proof that controlling the message is out, and giving people the opportunity to participate and play by their rules, is the key to a successful social media campaign.

 

It’s Hollywood, Baby!

HollywoodSign

If your PR practice is technology centric, it’s inevitable that your work will either be directly impacted by or lead to Silicon Valley.  Stick around long enough, and you will realize that Silicon Valley is the Hollywood for geeky people.  It’s so hot to be a nerdy, tech type!

There’s even a tech paparazzi rag, Valleywag, trying to sex up geeks! And of course Geek Entertainment TV, which includes a former Washingtonian, Irena Slutsky.

PH2007062101424 Before I go too far, consider that my city — Washington, DC — is the Hollywood for ugly people.  Where else could  folks like Condi Rice, Al Gore, Dick Cheney and Joe Lieberman become famous?  Welcome to the District of Corruption!

Back to Silicon Valleywood. Of course, there’s the truest of royalty, Steve Jobs.  Heck he’s so big, he actually is a Hollywood player sitting on the board of Disney, and CEO of Pixar.  A little rough for the Prince of Apple these days, but he’s basically the Spielberg of Silicon Valley.

Consider how Michael Arrington has basically become Russell Crowe, huge A-Lister, talented and yes, he knows it. Or how about Jeremiah Owyang whose career is skyrocketing at Forrester. But is his career destined to be like Val Kilmer’s, letting the hype become part of his character, or a perennial good guy like Tom Hanks? Scoble is so well liked… Hmm, the Johnny Depp of Silicon Valley?

Unfortunately, because it’s tech there are less starlets, but never fear. We’ve got starlets!  Is Andrea Weckerle Silicon Valley’s Susan Sarandon (the 80 version, of course)? Cathryn Hrudicka is Meryll Streep. And Leah Culver is a young starlet with a red hot career ahead of her, much like Keira Knightley.

Take Two

twitter I asked my Twitter friends, “DC is the Hollywood for ugly people. Silicon Valley is the Hollywood for geeky people. What other cities could have Hollywood analogies?” Their responses are below!

Chris Brogan (Twitter): Pittsburgh is the Hollywood for Internet people.

xtopher1974 (Twitter): What other cities want them?

Mike Keliher (Twitter): Right now I’m thinking Minneapolis is the Hollywood for people who aren’t afraid of the cold.

Sean Percival (Twitter): There are lots of ugly people here too, but hey we are all beautiful :)

Jay Berkowitz (Twitter): Hollywood, FL isn’t very hollywood at all

Todd Jordan (Twitter): St. Louis is Hollywood for the foodies

Simon Young (Twitter): Wellington, NZ is the Hollywood for sane people who still want to do movies :)

CML (Twitter): Omg.. Hilarious! Ok, Detroit is the Hollywood for fatties. And Boulder (CO) is the Hwood for stoned people.

Peter Corbett (Twitter): You’ve got that wrong. DC is the Hollywood for intelligent people!

Ontario Emperor (Twitter): new york is the hollywood for non-tech corporate people

Rob La Gesse (Twitter): San Antonio is the town for “we won’t classify you” people :)

Shannon Whitley (Twitter): SF is the Hollywood for homeless people.

 

Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire!

blogoffirelargerThere has been a lot of discussion over the past couple of weeks over what criteria makes someone an “expert” in social media. B.L. Ochman has a post that cites the importance of having a successful case study to prove social media knowledge and ROI.

Brains on Fire posts about tools to spread the word (based on a presentation from the WOMMA Summit). Tools for aiding through the process of participation, adoption to evangelism, and ownership are presented, with ideas such as customizing conversation tools, providing online and offline tools and finally bringing people together in person.

In discussing strategy, I came across this post on TheWebMarketCentral blog on developing a strategic marketing plan. Although it may be second nature to some, it’s always good to have a refresher checklist available to you.

thenewpr gives us six reasons to give Twitter a chance (as if we needed more convincing!). For those who have not already gotten the Twitter bug, these reasons may change your mind.

David Vinjamuri posts about Truemors.com (Craigslist meets Wikipedia) and the “stream of information” that comes from it. The idea of the site is for people to write anything they like, and then users can rate, and thus sort through the information. What rises to the top is the stuff the most people believe – or like. According to David, the central idea behind it is that citizens can report information directly on a joint forum. Does this mean that credible journalism (and blogging) is now going to be questioned with gossip, rummors, and false information? Or, will the forum develop into an additional outlet with a Wikipedia like effect – a question of entertainment value vs. accuracy?

Wal-Mart has launched a new blog and is again trying to get in touch with consumers, according to thenewmarketing blog (Jeremiah Owyang also has a post on the subject). It’s interesting to note that although Wal-Mart is (of course) receiving counsel for the blog, there seems to be no note of that anywhere on the blog. Is there enough trust in the Wal-Mart brand to overlook that simple disclaimer, or for the blog to succeed in general? We’ll see.

Chris Brogan comments on Robert Scoble’s recent post about the “un-sexiness” of enterprise software. However, Chris shows us how social media can be sexy and equips all of us with a voice, and an audience.

 

Convergence

tightrope

You can feel the tension.

Consider the following post titles from the past two months:

    And so interesting discussions are taking place about the proper placement of tools and roles. Unfortunately, driving square pegs into round holes never seems to work well. The end result equals healthy debates about semantics.
    Susan Getgood more than anyone nailed this one when she said the lines are ablurring. Convergence of communications and marketing disciplines is upon us.  Social media tools are forcing marketing, customer service and PR to work together. Further different departments have been assigned to manage social media, and in some cases it’s given it’s own role, Community Manager.

The Real Issue: Goodwill versus Transactions

Professor Bill Sledznik has an outstanding post that analyzed the differences between the PR and marketing disciplines, “Why I don’t trust marketing.” His beef was that too many 30-something PR bloggers blend marketing and PR,  and in process defined marketing and PR.  Check this out:

PR involves adaptation of behavior — a process through which organizations work to align themselves with the needs of publics… We must advocate for our clients but also for the stakeholders they impact.

…marketing is the process of getting goods and services to customers using those 4 Ps we learned about in college: product, price, placement and promotion.

These definitions are absolutely correct for the modern marketing and PR function in a traditional company. However, I think this division is a lost cause within social media tool sets (maybe because I’m 30-something). Convergence is upon us. But Sledznik’s accurate definitions describes the convergence crisis.  It’s the tension between PR’s mission to create goodwill between organizations and stakeholders, and marketing’s mission to deliver return on investment (ROI).

This crisis between goodwill and transaction is an inevitable result of tools that cross disciplines. Yet because they are multi-disciplinary tools, it’s important to comprehend all aspects. Whatever box you’re coming from, to be successful in social media I believe you must understand the classic purpose of PR: “the actions of a corporation, store, government, individual, etc., in promoting goodwill between itself and the public, the community, employees, customers, etc.”

We’ve seen numerous examples over the past few weeks (most notably Facebook’s Beacon) where placing transactions before goodwill has resulted in more corporate blow-ups. To me, the true tension revolves around the primary outcome.

Marketing needs transactions, but as we have seen, forcing this doesn’t work. More than ever permission (a result of goodwill) must occur before marketing occurs. Seth Godin’s Permission Marketing vision may finally be coming to fruition.

Two of my social media experiences (Goodwill and Godsmack lead singer Sully Erna’s book “The Paths We Choose”) demonstrated that success occurred when calls-to-action were discretely available to an engaged social media community.  That being said, those results were an intended by-product of goodwill, but not the primary outcome of our outreach efforts. People loved the fashion and Sully’s work enough to click through for more.

Will this convergence spill over into the traditional marketing department, forcing more PR outcomes into traditional marketing disciplines? Or will social media PR and marketing be its own unique discipline? The future is uncertain, and no one really knows.

 

Strategic Thinking

I’ll be the first to admit I’m still learning, but like any PR professional, I want to deliver the most thorough work to my client. While writing a strategy report this week, I started searching for a definition. I wanted a black and white definition for strategy. What I learned, is it all depends on the value proposition for your target audience.

Strategy is a term that comes from the Greek, strategia, meaning generalship. In the military, strategy often refers to maneuvering troops into position before the enemy is actually engaged. In basketball, strategy is about playing the right shots, tactics, on the other hand, is playing the shots right.

George Steiner’s book, Strategic Planning, is said to be a Bible when it comes to strategy. But he’s the first to point out that there is very little agreement as to the meaning of strategy in the business world. And that’s exactly what I found. Although the definitions I came across may vary dramatically, the general points were always there.

In The Art of War for Women, chin-ning chu says that before you can understand the opposition, you have to understand yourself. The book says we filter information about our opposition through our own lens and if you don’t know yourself, all the information will be filtered improperly. I liked that.

But my favorite example, and the one I’m going to stick with, came from Henry Mintzberg, in his 1994 book The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. He says it best: strategy is a means of getting from here to there, a pattern of actions over time, a position that reflects decision to offer particular products in particular markets, and finally, a perspective, vision and direction.

Strategic thinking is a means, pattern, position and perspective. I couldn’t have said it better.