<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR&#8217;s Ridiculous Identity Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/</link>
	<description>Musings and analysis on marketing, buzz and communications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-78525</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-78525</guid>
		<description>I am a Student at Georgia State University. I am in Dr. Joseph Trahan&#039;s Public Relations course. 

Public Relations is the management function which evaluates public attitudes, identifies the policies and procedures of an individual or an organization with the public interest, and plans, executes, and evaluates a program of action to earn public understanding and acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Student at Georgia State University. I am in Dr. Joseph Trahan&#8217;s Public Relations course. </p>
<p>Public Relations is the management function which evaluates public attitudes, identifies the policies and procedures of an individual or an organization with the public interest, and plans, executes, and evaluates a program of action to earn public understanding and acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Public Relationsâ€¦ Whatâ€™s the definition again? &#171; Columbia Sportswear blog</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-37866</link>
		<dc:creator>Public Relationsâ€¦ Whatâ€™s the definition again? &#171; Columbia Sportswear blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-37866</guid>
		<description>[...] one can seem to clearly agree on a set definition.  Take for example Geoff Livingston post about â€œPRâ€™s ridiculous identity crisis.â€ He pulls PR definitions from PRSA, the Institute for Public Relations, First World Form for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one can seem to clearly agree on a set definition.  Take for example Geoff Livingston post about â€œPRâ€™s ridiculous identity crisis.â€ He pulls PR definitions from PRSA, the Institute for Public Relations, First World Form for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategic Marketers See PR as a Function &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-37780</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategic Marketers See PR as a Function &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-37780</guid>
		<description>[...] cases, PR is an internal or hired function to execute a portion of a marketing campaign. And yes, PR is clearly undefined or over-defined, depending on how you see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cases, PR is an internal or hired function to execute a portion of a marketing campaign. And yes, PR is clearly undefined or over-defined, depending on how you see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A new definition for marketing &#171; Online PR course blog</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-31908</link>
		<dc:creator>A new definition for marketing &#171; Online PR course blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-31908</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] PR was struggled with this for years. Another interesting post along these lines is the one by Geoff Livingston referred to on our program blog last [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/nfs/c02/h08/mnt/28447/domains/livingstonbuzz.com/html/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] PR was struggled with this for years. Another interesting post along these lines is the one by Geoff Livingston referred to on our program blog last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defining Public Relations &#171; The Word</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-26765</link>
		<dc:creator>Defining Public Relations &#171; The Word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-26765</guid>
		<description>[...] out the recent blog posting by Geoff Livingston, author of the recently published Now Is Gone, to read more about the inconclusive debate on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out the recent blog posting by Geoff Livingston, author of the recently published Now Is Gone, to read more about the inconclusive debate on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-26012</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-26012</guid>
		<description>Been struggling with this myself. I have been actively blogging for three quarters on our corporate web site - one Friday afternoon, about 3 hours after I made a post, I got an inbound lead for our product offering. My efforts to foster goodwill produced an accidental lead...was I explicitly direct marketing?  Nope. My organization is small enought to measure cause and effect. 

As our organizations increasingly blur the lines of how consumers interact with their stakeholders, perhaps PR,Direct Marketing and Advertising will one day be called something entirely new?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been struggling with this myself. I have been actively blogging for three quarters on our corporate web site &#8211; one Friday afternoon, about 3 hours after I made a post, I got an inbound lead for our product offering. My efforts to foster goodwill produced an accidental lead&#8230;was I explicitly direct marketing?  Nope. My organization is small enought to measure cause and effect. </p>
<p>As our organizations increasingly blur the lines of how consumers interact with their stakeholders, perhaps PR,Direct Marketing and Advertising will one day be called something entirely new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Becker</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-25762</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-25762</guid>
		<description>Thank you Bill. Finish the conversation in social media? 

I&#039;d rather define public relations. :)

Best, 
Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Bill. Finish the conversation in social media? </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather define public relations. :)</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I don&#8217;t trust marketing: Part II &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-25753</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I don&#8217;t trust marketing: Part II &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-25753</guid>
		<description>[...] Geoff Livingston goes a few rounds with Rich, then does his own post. He morphs the discussion into an &#8220;identity crisis&#8221; for PR, and he includes a quote from me to sum it up. I&#8217;m flattered, but I guess I&#8217;m on Geoff&#8217;s shit list, as he didn&#8217;t include my last name or a link to the original post. No offense taken, Geoff. I&#8217;ve been an outcast since high school. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geoff Livingston goes a few rounds with Rich, then does his own post. He morphs the discussion into an &#8220;identity crisis&#8221; for PR, and he includes a quote from me to sum it up. I&#8217;m flattered, but I guess I&#8217;m on Geoff&#8217;s shit list, as he didn&#8217;t include my last name or a link to the original post. No offense taken, Geoff. I&#8217;ve been an outcast since high school. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Sledzik</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-25738</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Sledzik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-25738</guid>
		<description>Sorry. I neglected to mention this excellent post by Heather Yaxley, her first at PR Conversations, back in August.  She puts this subject in perspective using a simple analogy. Perhaps she even lays the debate to rest.

http://www.prconversations.com/?p=307</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I neglected to mention this excellent post by Heather Yaxley, her first at PR Conversations, back in August.  She puts this subject in perspective using a simple analogy. Perhaps she even lays the debate to rest.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prconversations.com/?p=307" rel="nofollow">http://www.prconversations.com/?p=307</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Sledzik</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-25736</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Sledzik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/12/12/prs-ridiculous-identity-crisis/#comment-25736</guid>
		<description>...and when you come a fork in the road, take it!  Gotta love Yogi, but I&#039;ll always hate the Yankees.

If you immerse yourself in any of the big professional organizations, PRSA and IABC in particular, you won&#039;t hear as much of this &quot;debate,&quot; nor will you hear ridicule of the profession.  That&#039;s a problem far more prevalent in the blogosphere, and I guess we&#039;re all contributing to it with this thread.  Both IABC and PRSA are well focused on the mission of PR and the definitions that embody it. 

Though I&#039;ve had my differences with PRSA this past year, I don&#039;t disagree at any philosophical level.  The definitions and descriptions put forth by PRSA and IABC tend to be abstract, a product of a lot of deep reflection by some pretty smart folks who sometimes get caught up in their own jargon. The Cutlip definition that Lauren cites is another example of it. To a professional it&#039;s entirely clear, to my mother, it&#039;s total gibberish. But the profession isn&#039;t talking to my mom.

In the end, PR isn&#039;t a complex business, but its reach is  broad. Communication, after all, involves all aspects of the organization.  As such, it means different things to different people. I just got off the phone with our local IABC president, and he tells me that 70% of the group&#039;s members internationally have a major or primary focus on internal communication.  You won&#039;t find anywhere near that skew at PRSA, which tends to be dominated by factions from marketing and strategic communication (as if we promote communication that isn&#039;t strategic).
  
No doubt we need an &quot;integrated communication&quot; function. I just don&#039;t think marketing has a broad enough view to do the integrating. 

Well, it&#039;s been fun. Thanks for putting up with my second tome in 12 hours.  My good friend Andy Curran may have said it best with his comment over at my place:

&quot;I predict that there will be peace in the Middle East, a Cleveland team will win a world championship, and it will snow in Miami Beach in July before a resolution to this debate occurs!&quot;

Link: http://toughsledding.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/why-i-dont-trust-marketing/#comment-14121

Andy has to be right, because he loves Yogi Berra and he hates the Yankees even more than I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and when you come a fork in the road, take it!  Gotta love Yogi, but I&#8217;ll always hate the Yankees.</p>
<p>If you immerse yourself in any of the big professional organizations, PRSA and IABC in particular, you won&#8217;t hear as much of this &#8220;debate,&#8221; nor will you hear ridicule of the profession.  That&#8217;s a problem far more prevalent in the blogosphere, and I guess we&#8217;re all contributing to it with this thread.  Both IABC and PRSA are well focused on the mission of PR and the definitions that embody it. </p>
<p>Though I&#8217;ve had my differences with PRSA this past year, I don&#8217;t disagree at any philosophical level.  The definitions and descriptions put forth by PRSA and IABC tend to be abstract, a product of a lot of deep reflection by some pretty smart folks who sometimes get caught up in their own jargon. The Cutlip definition that Lauren cites is another example of it. To a professional it&#8217;s entirely clear, to my mother, it&#8217;s total gibberish. But the profession isn&#8217;t talking to my mom.</p>
<p>In the end, PR isn&#8217;t a complex business, but its reach is  broad. Communication, after all, involves all aspects of the organization.  As such, it means different things to different people. I just got off the phone with our local IABC president, and he tells me that 70% of the group&#8217;s members internationally have a major or primary focus on internal communication.  You won&#8217;t find anywhere near that skew at PRSA, which tends to be dominated by factions from marketing and strategic communication (as if we promote communication that isn&#8217;t strategic).</p>
<p>No doubt we need an &#8220;integrated communication&#8221; function. I just don&#8217;t think marketing has a broad enough view to do the integrating. </p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s been fun. Thanks for putting up with my second tome in 12 hours.  My good friend Andy Curran may have said it best with his comment over at my place:</p>
<p>&#8220;I predict that there will be peace in the Middle East, a Cleveland team will win a world championship, and it will snow in Miami Beach in July before a resolution to this debate occurs!&#8221;</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://toughsledding.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/why-i-dont-trust-marketing/#comment-14121" rel="nofollow">http://toughsledding.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/why-i-dont-trust-marketing/#comment-14121</a></p>
<p>Andy has to be right, because he loves Yogi Berra and he hates the Yankees even more than I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
