Comments on: Why “3.0?”

By: 3rdidea (3rdidea)

3rdidea (3rdidea) — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:32:27 +0000

Twitter Comment

RT @along5418: [link to post] Corporate America Keeps Rejecting Social Media //?????????

- Posted using Chat Catcher

By: along5418 (Bruce/???)

along5418 (Bruce/???) — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:36 +0000

Twitter Comment

[link to post] Corporate America Keeps Rejecting Social Media //?????????

- Posted using Chat Catcher

By: Web 3.0 & Walt Disney (Part 4) - Sramana Mitra on Strategy

Web 3.0 & Walt Disney (Part 4) - Sramana Mitra on Strategy — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:20:11 +0000

[...] Why "3.0"? » The Buzz Bin Friday, November 9, 2007 at 9:48 AM PT [...]

By: Marketing Whore

Marketing Whore — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:16:39 +0000

Man, I’m so bummed I didn’t see this when posted… I would have then said: “I’ll have to change my Web Poo Point Doh to Web Pee Point Doh.” It would have been fresher then. :sigh:

By: Blatant Propaganda from Spin Thicket

Blatant Propaganda from Spin Thicket — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:39:37 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Conversation Agent: Web 3.0 AI Agents as Discovery Channels

Conversation Agent: Web 3.0 AI Agents as Discovery Channels — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:02:16 +0000

[...] I know, Web 3.0 can be used as a sexy term to up one on the folks talking about Web 2.0. And it can be confusing to talk about [...]

By: Jake Matthews

Jake Matthews — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:28:10 +0000

Where exactly will the web go beyond data input to advanced social tools and blogs from our computing modules?

I don’t care if we call it 1, 2, or 3.0. But if we are going to jump from 2 to 3 in the span of two years, what happened to all of the other versions of 2; like 2.1, 2.2 and so on…

Just like Jeff and Brian have published – “Now is Gone”, and that’s a fact.

By: Albert Maruggi

Albert Maruggi — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:29:40 +0000

Excactly Geoff forget the number naming try this

Web Descartes – I think of it therefore it can be –
“so Mr/Ms (title) what relationships do you want to have with (insert group name)? How open are you willing to be, and oh yes about commitment…?”

By: Geoff Livingston

Geoff Livingston — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:35:49 +0000

Lewis, I agree. Marketing needs to deliver relevant messaging.

Brian, always educational. Yes, 3.0 is already losing that semantic touch thanks to spin. Really, it shouldn’t be called anything but what it is, the numeric stuff just messes people up. But database driven web techs have been very useful for enterprises — salesforce.com, Eloqa — etc. so these advancements will be welcome.

Ike, very funny as usual.

Thanks all for the drive by.

By: Lewis Green

Lewis Green — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:12:39 +0000

Geoff,

Most of us who use this stuff don’t know or really care what Web 2.0 or 3.0 mean. We just want the tools. I’ve gone to identifying social media as a packet of strategies and tools that need to be integrated with the traditional strategies and tools that came before. I don’t really care about the technology; my clients and I only care about the results. The nuances can be left to those who care about such things. If a tool works great, I’ll use it. If it doesn’t work, I won’t. And by work I mean grow a business, serve customers wants and needs and produce results for both.