<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Letter to Doubting PR Practitioners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/06/10/a-letter-for-doubting-pr-practitioners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/06/10/a-letter-for-doubting-pr-practitioners/</link>
	<description>Musings and analysis on marketing, buzz and communications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Communication Overtones: PR 2.0 is Just a Return to Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/06/10/a-letter-for-doubting-pr-practitioners/comment-page-1/#comment-2435</link>
		<dc:creator>Communication Overtones: PR 2.0 is Just a Return to Basics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 02:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/2007/06/10/a-letter-for-doubting-pr-practitioners/#comment-2435</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Related Articles:PR 2.0 Essentials GuideA Letter to Doubting PR Practitioners [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/nfs/c02/h08/mnt/28447/domains/livingstonbuzz.com/html/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Related Articles:PR 2.0 Essentials GuideA Letter to Doubting PR Practitioners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
