<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint Highlights Corporate America&#8217;s Negative Hubris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/04/11/sprint-highlights-corporate-americas-negative-hubris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/04/11/sprint-highlights-corporate-americas-negative-hubris/</link>
	<description>Musings and analysis on marketing, buzz and communications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CustomScoop's PR Blog Jots: May 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/04/11/sprint-highlights-corporate-americas-negative-hubris/comment-page-1/#comment-14736</link>
		<dc:creator>CustomScoop's PR Blog Jots: May 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/?p=231#comment-14736</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Or perhaps that headline ought to read, â€œPR Bloggers: Trusting or Cynical?â€&#160; Andrea Morris praises Sprintâ€™s new effort to build customer loyalty, but joins me in wondering about the companyâ€™s true intentions. Andrea received a cutesy thank-you card that appeared to be hand-addressed, thanking her for her patronage.&#160; The idea is terrific, and will no-doubt help with brand-loyalty, but was it a response to a negative article about Sprint CEO Gary Forseeâ€™s compensation in the Washington Post last month? â€œWith this gentle reminder, Sprint effectively made me just a little more brand loyal - which adds to my lifetime valueâ€¦Still, being the skeptic I am, part of me wonders if this is authentic. Could this be in response to the Washington Post article Geoff commented on last month?â€ [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/nfs/c02/h08/mnt/28447/domains/livingstonbuzz.com/html/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Or perhaps that headline ought to read, â€œPR Bloggers: Trusting or Cynical?â€&nbsp; Andrea Morris praises Sprintâ€™s new effort to build customer loyalty, but joins me in wondering about the companyâ€™s true intentions. Andrea received a cutesy thank-you card that appeared to be hand-addressed, thanking her for her patronage.&nbsp; The idea is terrific, and will no-doubt help with brand-loyalty, but was it a response to a negative article about Sprint CEO Gary Forseeâ€™s compensation in the Washington Post last month? â€œWith this gentle reminder, Sprint effectively made me just a little more brand loyal &#8211; which adds to my lifetime valueâ€¦Still, being the skeptic I am, part of me wonders if this is authentic. Could this be in response to the Washington Post article Geoff commented on last month?â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Buzz Bin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sprint Gets Personal</title>
		<link>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2007/04/11/sprint-highlights-corporate-americas-negative-hubris/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>The Buzz Bin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sprint Gets Personal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/?p=231#comment-884</guid>
		<description>[...] Still, being the skeptic I am, part of me wonders if this is authentic. Could this be in response to the Washington Post article Geoff commented on last month? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Still, being the skeptic I am, part of me wonders if this is authentic. Could this be in response to the Washington Post article Geoff commented on last month? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
