Livingston

Mar
19
2007

A Marketing Revolutionary Can Win Two Nats Tix

I have two good tickets (section 327, aisle seats) to the April 4 game of the Washington Nationals opening home stand against the Marlins that I will give to the person who offers the best thoughts on today’s marketing revolution. The deal is you have to comment on the blog so others can see it, and the deadline is March 26, close of business.

Marketing revolution? Part of my new web site will include a little essay on the marketing revolution we are encountering caused by the new media environment. Here’s an outline of my thoughts:

  1. The new media environment (blogs, networks, etc.) has disrupted traditional marketing in a break-out fashion over the past 18 months
  2. The result has impacted all forms of communications from journalism and PR to advertising and Internet campaigns, finally killing mass communications and thrusting word of mouth marketing to the forefront
  3. Credibility brokers — independent voices on the net, journalists, analysts, social networks (digg, you tube) — have more impact than any other form of marketing
  4. Because credibility is what matters, companies and corporate America as whole are being forced into a new era of transparency and good corporate citizenship
  5. Marketing no longer can be planned on an annual campaign basis. Instead, marketers must be flexible, capable of meeting the vast and dynamic changes that are occurring in every media form

This topic fascinates me, because my business is so directly impacted by it. I have five major new business leads right now, and three of them are blog/new media oriented. Most of my marketing practices from ten years ago are no longer relevant. For example, the press release as a news vehicle is dead. Now it’s a mere tool to possibly engage a journalist in a conversation, but certainly no longer the means to a direct story.

What are your thoughts? How do you see the marketing revolution evolving?

2 Responses to “A Marketing Revolutionary Can Win Two Nats Tix”

  • Marc Hausman Says:

    Jeff,

    Your comment about the value and viability of the press is off base. In fact, I would even argue they are of increasing importance today because they are read by audiences other than the media, such as investors, customers, partners, prospective employees, etc.

    My colleague Chris Parente recently wrote on this topic in a PR trade publication. Here’s a link:

    The Press Release is Alive and Well
    All About Public Relations
    March 16, 2007
    By: Chris Parente
    http://www.aboutpublicrelations.net/ucparente1.htm

    -Marc Hausman

  • Geoff Livingston Says:

    You are correct, the press release still has some value, my language above was a little strong. In a blog entry last year, I contended that the press release’s value is significantly diminished, and my experience on the phones validates that. I now try to broker stories well before we hit the wires, and use more creative pitching techniques.

    GL

Leave a Reply